this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
895 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

11717 readers
1882 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 287 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If the topic really is "a luxury I can't live without," then quality coffee is a great example, and a private plane is a profoundly bad example.

It's so shockingly wrong that it's hard to imagine it's not just a bit that they worked out ahead of time.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 137 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The rich will claim you’re driving them to abject poverty if you tax them into only having a million dollars.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

There are no good billionaires

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 68 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My bare minimum standard for calling a person "rich" is whether they can live in luxury purely on the passive income from their investments. By that standard, a person with only a million dollars would not be rich. You probably need more like 10 million.

I agree one million isn't abject poverty, but it would be a giant change in lifestyle. They'd either have to give up on most luxuries and live somewhere cheap, or they'd have to actually work for money.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

6% interest in 10million is 600k plenty to live on unless you have multiple houses, personal cruise ships or private jets.

[–] Ava@piefed.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 day ago

A safe withdrawal rate on funds invested is usually 3-4%, not 6%.

Not that $300k isn't more than sufficient for a high quality lifestyle. Your point is more than valid.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Historical average of the stock market, who the fucking knows now. I get shit because I’m not saving at the moment.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not sure you're trying to say that I did, but I didn't mean that 10 million was the minimum needed to say a person is rich.

I was saying my standard for rich was in the neighborhood of 10 million, compared to 1 million. If you have 1 million, your 6% would be 60k, but you don't get interest on your house where you're living, so if you purchased a house in today's market that might be 250k, and now you're down to 45k. Certainly not a salary where you can live in luxury.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 4 points 1 day ago

A house for 250k? Lucky!!

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago

About $2million is enough for a trust fund one can live relatively comfortably on. $10million and you can live in excess indefinitely.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Like, sorta, but also no. “Most luxuries” and “live somewhere cheap” are both insane things to say, too.

I know what you’re trying to get at, and I get it, but to say that someone who can still drive any car they want, live pretty much wherever except for some very specific places, get into whatever niche hobby their heart desires, and never needs to fear unemployment is not rich is just silly. I also said “tax them”, which means they’d still have everything else they currently own and could make money on that stuff, too.

A person with a million dollars is a person without any meaningful restriction on their life.

Edit: Goddamn, a lot of ya’ll really upset about this comment. Too bad, learn to read, and, failing that, find a high bridge over deep water ‘cause dealing with ya’ll just ain’t worth it.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You said "tax them into only having a million dollars," which I cannot reconcile with your latest statement "they’d still have everything else they currently own and could make money on that stuff, too."

If you are talking purely about how much cash they have in the bank, then every person would just buy stocks until they had under that amount. Almost nothing would change.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

FWIW, stocks also need to be taxed a lot more than they are, or sharply limited in their trading potential and/or as compensation. Compensation in stock is how most of the billionaires of today amass their wealth, and it needs to stop being the loophole that it is.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 1 day ago

Isn't a million like the price of a house these days? I get that we're all poor and we're never gonna own property, but the price of a house isn't enough to live in luxury for life.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago

Well, if I had a million right now and stopped working, and everyone in my family would not work either anymore, that million will not last us even until my retirement age, that's also if the inflation is 0% until then. A million 50 years ago would probably be enough for that, but not now

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

To be fair, a million dollars in some parts of the US gets you a decent size house and one car. You still need to work every day. You can still be bankrupt by medical debt.

Contrast that with actual rich folks who can burn a million dollars in a bon fire every morning and still have more money at the end of the year than they started with.

Point is: The former are more comfortable than many. The latter are a literal cancer on society that must be addressed.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I know man but with a million bucks you can choose to move somewhere cheap to live. The rest of us can't do that because there aren't good jobs in the cheap areas. There's plenty of beautiful homes for $200k in my state but there all in the middle of nowhere 3 hour drive from the closest city that has a hospital.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, let's say I move somewhere cheap. Now I have a million bucks.

I can't retire. Still got to work. Still need health insurance. Still at the whims of the fate of the universe.

Is it more comfortable? Sure! I'd love that. But these people aren't the problem. The yacht with the garage for a smaller yacht in it is the problem.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I mean yeah it's cheap so you can retire there lol, but those people are a problem because they're still trying to become billionaires and also they're the soldiers of the billionaires. For $100k a year theyre the ones denying good insurance claims and areesting peaceful protestors, Bezos and Musk themselves don't hurt society with their own bodies, they pay upper middle class folk to do that for them. Then they retire with a mil or two in the bank and try to blame the people they agreed to work for their whole lives.

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I guess it depends what people consider the "millionaire lifestyle", which must go up with inflation like everything else.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

a decent size house and a car ≠ abject poverty

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the rich

abject poverty

You realize that there are options in-between those, right?

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes i do and i totally agree with your point, just pointing at a flaw in your reasoning

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, I'm still not seeing it. Sorry.

The top 1% are cancer on society. Quite literally. They consume resources and expand to the point where it kills the host.

People in the top 20%, excluding the 1%, aren't like that. They're surely more comfortable. They surely have better opportunity. But their existence doesn't threaten the rest of us.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The comment you replied to states "The rich will claim you’re driving them to abject poverty if you tax them into only having a million dollars."

You say people with $1.000.000 still have to work, they are not "actual rich folk". But that's not relevant to the comment you reply to, since them "having to work all day" and them still being able to be "bankrupt by medical debt" still doesn't equal the abject poverty the rich claim they'll be driven to. In other words, it doesn't matter that people with one million are not in the same position as the people with ten million, because neither would be living in abject poverty; ergo my comment.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That classifies people with 2 million as rich. I'm saying that even with 5 million you need to keep working.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago

I'm saying whether you need to keep working or not is not relevant, since it in neither case does owning that amount equal to abject poverty.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Larry King is a well known numbskull, he would literally avoid researching his interviewees before because he thought it made for better interviews, but it ended up just making him look ignorant

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

That was one thing I did like the concept of, but it is terrible on TV.

I like it because it's like being at a party and just chatting, only to discover you're talking to a world famous heart surgeon, but they're too humble to explain it all. It may also be refreshing to them, as they're so used to getting all the attention and here is this person interviewing them who isn't a stan.

Larry though kind of has a chip on his shoulder. He is always bragging and name dropping. Which makes him intolerable to watch.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The fact that we can buy quality coffee, spices, and salt for such cheap prices would be unfathomably luxurious to almost every other person from human history pre-1910.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine the richest king from 1700 watching you throw away mushy brown bananas. He'd think you were loaded.

[–] iN8sWoRLd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

"Sure, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system, and public health ... what have the Romans ever done for us?"

[–] Droechai@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dont forget access to light 24hours a day, pumped water and sanitation plumbing. Those where more than luxuries when my grandparents were kids

[–] HurricaneLiz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I remind myself of these things you and the person above you said every day. Plus, I would be dead without soap and antibiotics. I'm richer than most royalty throughout history and I'm on disability. I could be homeless and dead inside a month, I'm good right now, but there's zero security. I tell myself I could be a Queen from back in the day living with an execution writ over her head if something goes wrong she has no control over, and try to handle things with as much grace as I can. The gratitude for all these things I can take for granted is profound though. Air conditioning is just amazing!