this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
232 points (99.2% liked)

News

38242 readers
1647 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"VATICAN CITY, June 23 (Reuters) - The Vatican on Tuesday reaffirmed a long-standing rule that only an ordained priest or ​deacon can give a sermon at a Catholic mass, ‌rejecting a request from German bishops to broaden the practice and allow sermons by women or other laypeople."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Which Bible? Which translation, which council? Because most of the stuff in "the Bible" changes with every translation. An example would be the relatively recent changes to condemn homosexuality when originally they were condemning the Roman practice of pederasty.

Anyway, first century Jewish girls were usually betrothed during or immediately after puberty and as she was already promised to Joseph according to one gospel she would have been between 12 and 16. It's possible she was an outlier but much more likely if she did exist she was pregnant around 14.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

read the original greek and hebrew at this point if you hate translations this much

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You are so close to the point. It's all made up bro. It's fiction.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 week ago
[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can't prove a negative. You're the one that claims god exists, where's your empirical evidence? Where's your proof? Repeatable, testable proof? As it is there's no evidence whatsoever of any deity of any kind so there's no reason to believe they'd exist. You say they do, that's your claim, now prove it. Maybe learn some rhetoric and logic first so you can actually have a legitimate good faith discussion.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Genesis 1:3 And God said, “Let there be light.” And light became.

how did the Apostle John and the author of Genesis know thay light can be created from matter more than a thousand years before it was proven via colliders?

John 1:4 Life was in Him, and Life was the light of men.

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

how did the Apostle John and the author of Genesis know thay light can be created from matter more than a thousand years before it was proven via colliders?

They didn't? Nothing in that passage implies anything scientific or anything even about the nature of light and the relationship between matter and energy.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the Bible is in parables

and yes, it does? Light can create, and God is the light of all men, God is the creator of all men, and God also illuminates our lives in a special way

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The new testament isn't in parables at all. Some of the characters in the new testament use parables, but that's not the same. And if the bible is parables, nothing in it is meant to be taken in any way literally which clearly isn't the case. You're taking contradictory positions. And nothing about the passage implies anything about light or physics whatsoever.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

MOST of it is in parables, the parts about Jesus and his life are personal testimonies of the disciples

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Do your arms get tired carrying those goalposts?

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok if that's your proof then I can use quotes from the Hobbit to prove dragons are real.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

if tolkien predicted particle physics 2000+ years ago before modern colliders I would say he has a point

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Bible didn't predict particle physics and I'm genuinely confused as to how you get that interpretation.

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it implies that light can possibly create matter

[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

How? Be specific. Use established theological scholarly sources for your assertion. I've never heard anyone make this type of claim before. What denomination do you practice, and is that belief in line with your established canon?