this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
867 points (97.5% liked)

196

6448 readers
1729 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's a little naïve, isn't it? Your fighting force isn't trained, doesn't have any equipment and so on, more people will die because of this.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Switzerland has conscription for men and voluntary service for women over 19. They receive military training and are issued a service weapon. They then return to civilian life, with the idea being the population is now an armed militia in the case of invasion.

It seems to have worked out for them so far, surviving being right in the middle of 2 world wars.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland#Government_and_politics scroll down from there to Military

[–] napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.org 19 points 3 days ago

It seems to have worked out for them so far, surviving being right in the middle of 2 world wars.

Their conscription system is only a part of the story. Switzerland was not invaded in WW2 because:

A. it is geographically difficult to invade, has a lot of bunkers and armed people.

B. because the Nazis used it to exchange gold and currency to Swiss Francs and get free access to trade with neutral countries. Switzerland was more useful to Germany as a "banker" and middleman during trade embargoes than it could have ever been as occupied territory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switzerland_during_World_War_I_and_World_War_II#Financial_relationships_with_Nazi_Germany

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I know about Switzerland, they have a military with conscription. Lots of countries in Europe are currently considering reintroducing conscription, but that's not some random fighting force that assembles out of nowhere in times of need, it's still a military.

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

quick note:

that's national service, not conscription.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That training is funded from the Swiss military budget for the purpose of protecting the state of Switzerland? Suggesting that conscription, aka a mandatory military service term, is akin to a training program for stateless militias seems to me a bit of a stretch...

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If a fighting force assembles when its home country is attacked and disbands once they're no longer being invaded, it hardly feels like "the military" at that point. That's not how it works these days, at least in most places.

I'm pro abolition of the state, but this comment thread had no mention of a stateless society.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Fair point, I'll accept that bit of nuance.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

scroll down from there to Military

So it is a military then?

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You could train them, obviously. My point was that when people think of "joining the military" they aren't thinking about a defensive war - which is true. So "the military" is, overall, pretty bad. (Some might argue a necessary evil, perhaps, but it's still bad.)

The logistics of what you'd replace the current system with are beyond the scope of "is the military bad?"

[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I would argue that the vast majority of people think that joining the military is about defensive war. There is a reason that military enlistment skyrockets in a country after that country has been attacked by a foreign source.

Generally a government must convince its populace that a war not taking place on its own soil is still defensive, because offensive war isn't palatable to the vast majority of people.