this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
473 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

85805 readers
3556 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You can even hear it in the video, link added...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Well that was pointless.

Was there supposed to be something on the "sound readings" meter? Can I see it?

No.

[–] czardestructo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For what its worth, despite missing the punchline of the actual measurement, the guy knows what he is talking about. Taking a dB measurement in C weighting over some integration period is how to do it for this scenario. I doubt his meter is calibrated but its doing a good job.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Taking a dB measurement in C weighting over some integration period

Yeah, the non filtering of the lower frequencies happens when done correctly, if I recall. I am curious what that actually is, and I am curious what is making those specific frequencies.

At a certain decibel range of ambient noise, humans become even more sensitive to the lower freqs. Being able to use that knowledge while taking measurements of my own is useful to me.

I would be interested to know the sound signature of gas turbines.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Probably would've been worthless since they were talking over it

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hear it perfectly. It is a sort of background hum.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not really data though. It could be anything.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"yeah there's a new giant structure and there's a new persistent and pervasive sound in the region that both appeared around the same time, but there's no data connecting the two. It could just be the sound of my own ego"

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's more about what the guy is saying.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lots of people say lots of things. I was interested in the data. Particularly since he said he was collecting it!

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Mr Ben Jordan has a very good video about this. Collects a lot of data

https://youtu.be/_bP80DEAbuo?is=LUTnzlWf3e3ltwx4

[–] philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

While standing next to his sound strength measuring setup no less...

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He should have showed more.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did you not hear the noise with your own two ears? Are you that fucking deaf and willfully ignorant that you you need to see a number and can’t, without it, hear exactly what he’s talking about?

“It’s a conversation that never stops, is in your bedroom, and you can’t turn off, ever. It’s not loud but it never stops.” should be more than enough to make the point abundantly clear especially when you can fucking hear the sound in the video.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

People like you are insufferable. He had a device and he found it worth using, I too would like to see that device. What the fuck is wrong with you that you need to say I am deaf and willingly ignorant because you don't want to know more?

Damn, people like you make it hard to give a shit about bad things. I just wanted more information, data centers are noisy, I know that. I also have a decibel meter and want to know the db (or dba with calibration) and I am interested in the wave and frequencies. Because, you know, I want to know these things. I am curious about how these sounds are generated. The fans? The cooling system? A back up generator? How are the frequencies effecting people in various other industries?

Sorry you have no interest in the world, and a video of someone saying "its loud" pointing to some trees in the distance is all you the capacity you have for knowledge.

Fuck right off.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You called it “pointless”, thay was the problem. You could not see any worth in the video without seeing the number. Yes, it would be nice to see it, but holy fuck, dipshit, you can kick rocks with attitude.

And let the door hit you on the way out.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes it was pointless. There was nothing of interest in that video. There was nothing to take away that was useful or new.

And if you have been on the internet for the last few years, you don't take some dude standing on the porch saying "shits loud" somewhere over there beyond the trees as being anything to make note of.

Come on. We can do better. Data is a worthwhile thing to have.

And let the door hit you on the way out.

You are really not looking for allies in this are you? You had no reason to come out swinging and being an asshole.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Literally you can hear the thing in the video. I don’t need to trust his words if I can hear the fucking thing clear as day. I also hadn’t heard the noise like that yet, so it was new to me. You’re just moving the goalposts to justify your shitty attitude.

With allies like you, who needs enemies?

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Its the frequencies you can't here that are what you want to pay attention to.

Lots of people live in loud areas, just look at population centers overlayed with highways noise maps.

A noise is simply not that interesting by itself.

I'll bury the hatchet: if the noise gets you interested to learn more then I suppose it isn't pointless.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

He literally talked about how the sound never went away like with highways. I live in a city, night time is significantly quieter without all the cars ripping around. Cities are actually pretty damn quiet, it’s the cars that are loud. He said it felt like a low conversation that never, ever stopped and that it was impossible to get away from, even in his own bedroom where us city folk are pretty safe from too much sound.

I’m sure that sounds we can’t hear are also really bad, not arguing that, and I am also not arguing that the data itself would be awesome(they may be compiling and not ready to put all the data out yet) and thank you for the acknowledgement.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

There are plenty of highways that almost never stop these days, while their peak hours are much louder than this. That was a huge frustration for me, this amount of noise (conversational decibels) is really not much and very hard to relate to by audio from a clip alone.

Think of all the people that live near freeways with international airports next to those. Airplanes coming and going all day, traffic constantly.

That's why I wanted to see data and get a real distance from the data center, and an actual db reading. I just can't do anything with this video.

Another example is wind turbines. Near constant noise https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=78QwBM_AD3s

How loud exactly is that? At least I have some sense of the distance. People are concerned about the frequencies of these too, although a Finnish study could find no correlation.