this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
104 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

4439 readers
9 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MinorLaceration@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Another potential issue is the possibility of overloading a circuit if these are used incorrectly. Basically, having enough load on the same circuit as too many of these panels would cause over current that is not seen by the upstream breaker. That's probably an unlikely circumstance but something to be aware of and to design controls to prevent.

[–] Jimny_Crkt@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You have to understand, for this to happen you would need more than 15/20 amps of electrical use plugged into that circuit. As soon as a cloud reduces the solar output, the entire load would be on the utility end of the circuit and the breaker would trip.

[–] MinorLaceration@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I agree. Clouds are my preferred form of overcurrent protection.

[–] Jimny_Crkt@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

I guess my point is that creating an over current condition requires plugging in more demand than the circuit is designed for, and the solar piece would only allow that setup to run intermittently. A reasonable person would turn off some of the load or move it to other outlets the first time the breaker tripped.

[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are typically reduced to 800W upstream. And you should plug only one into one current.

At the end it depends in the strength/ thickness of your power cable.

[–] sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And you should plug only one into one current.

What happens when you plug in more than one? Is there some kind of safety circuitry that detects this and shuts it off?

[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think so.

Even the correct cable connection is essential - parallel or serial PV panels into the inverter.

If you do not read the fck manual, you should not play with power toys.

[–] sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Seems like the safest thing to do is to design products to fail safely even if the owner doesn't follow the manual. Relying on the competence of end users alone is, in my opinion, not enough.

[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Those systems are save. However, one can always crash it, if not used properly or fiddling around.

Same as you can refuel diesel in your petrol car. You can’t avoid dumb users entirely.

[–] sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

Same as you can refuel diesel in your petrol car.

In the U.S., at least, diesel fuel dispenser nozzles don't fit in a typical gasoline car. The engineers have intentionally designed standards to reduce human error.

That's what should happen with any home electrical appliances, to reduce dangerous practices. It can't be eliminated entirely, but things should be designed assuming that people don't follow directions and don't read the manual, have safety features that physically or electronically prevent power from going to the wrong place or in the wrong quantities.