this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
560 points (99.8% liked)

World News

56570 readers
2417 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nearly 55% of voters in Switzerland on Sunday rejected an initiative championed by the top right-wing party to cap the rich Alpine country’s population at 10 million, early results showed.

The populist Swiss People’s Party, which has the most seats in parliament, has stirred up and fostered anti-migration sentiment over the years, notably about an influx of workers from the neighboring European Union.

Some have dubbed the proposal a “Swiss Brexit” because it could jeopardize Switzerland’s deep ties to the European Union anchored by deals that foster economic growth, cultural ties and cross-border travel, among other things. Switzerland is not one of the EU’s 27 member states, but it is all but surrounded by four of them

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vrek@programming.dev 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I know this isn't how it would work but im just picturing some one woman giving birth, the doctor hands her the newborn and she holds it for the first time... Some man walks in wearing a black suit and pulls out a gun. He shoots the baby through the head. "sorry that was the 10 million and 1 Swiss child, we have a limit!"

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Clearly it would be more humane to take out the oldest Swiss person instead of the youngest

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Much better idea: kill the richest person and distribute their wealth evenly amongst the rest of the population, public infrastructure, and social programs

Repeat until there's no billionaires, no poverty, and nobody has to go without anything essential for living in a modern society.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

this is switzerland, silly. they're more likely to kill the poorest first.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

It's Switzerland. You could close your eyes and shoot the bullet blindly, you would probably hit a billionaire.

Out of all the countries in the world that shouldn't be implementing population caps, it's Switzerland. The entirety economy is based on people and corporations moving there.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That could be worse...watching tv on the couch with your spouse, you both laugh at the joke suddenly the door opens and your partners head splatters everywhere. The man in a black suit says "sorry, the tompsons just had a baby"...

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Statistically it's more common for the oldest person to be a widow(er)

But if the Swiss population started to get out of control maybe

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Probably true but not as funny to picture...

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah the nation-wide vote is the most moral approach. The list of candidates is selected from trending posts on social media, then the whole nation decides whom to kill in a democratic way.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

I don't know... I'm also considering completely random.

The dice show.... 543, John go kill your mother,sorry for your loss.

[–] Canadian_anarchist@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You might find Kurt Vonnegut Jr.'s story "2BR02B" ("to be or not to be") an interesting read. It's not exactly like your theory, but it's not too far off.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 22 hours ago

Love death robots pop squad was also similar.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Hmm, I've liked some of his writing so I'll add this to my list.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This initiative was a conservative movement.

It would have been used as a cudgel to oppress immigrants or to target the out group.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

And when they run out of immigrants: Rules is rules

[–] vrek@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I understood that. But a hard limit on population is crazy. You would need to have some way of killing people for each person born. That's disregarding the fact that people have a beneficial use. They can help in food, service, manufacturing, business to business stuff.

But taken to the extreme if some person in a suit just going around the country killing people for each person born...

I don't know how many hospitals are in Switzerland or how big they are but it's definitely more than 10 a day so imagine someone just driving around all day yelling at traffic and any delay because they need to report how many people they killed that week and praying it's not a busy week in the maternity ward...

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Or just denying citizenship or deporting. You know, other forms of state based violence

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 14 hours ago

But how can that be sustainable? Ok sure you set up a limit of 5000 immigrants per year. Fine you deny everyone at the border over that limit.

How do you limit population? Either kill people or prevent them from having sex...logistics of both are pretty hard.

People have babies. That increases population.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Xenophobia and anti-immigrant policies are now present in almost every developed country.

Fucking xenophobes in Japan are not helping in that they're bent on keeping racial purity and "peace and order", anxious to kick out the Kurds, but at the cost of their falling population, growing numbers of shut-ins, and insane costs of living.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Are there Kurds in Japan? That's news to me.

Unfortunately, xenophobia is rising in many parts of the world, even in countries with negligible number of immigrants like Japan. I'm even surprised that in Chile, anti-migrant is a sticking point on their recent elections, even though they barely have any immigrants and many Chileans are even leaving.

I am blaming social media for amplifying polarisation. The elites are doing what they can to divide the population while they steal from our pockets because we're too distracted.