this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
945 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30031 readers
2656 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While the intake report memorialized allegations that multiple girls were murdered and buried at a Trump golf course, newly released Epstein records suggest federal investigators ultimately viewed the source skeptically. Other FBI summaries released by the Justice Department indicate complainants making similar allegations were “deemed not credible,” and no publicly released records show that authorities excavated any Trump golf course or uncovered evidence supporting the claims.

Guess the rich only ever saw consequences once: France in 1792

What would America's Storming the Bastille moment even look like? Storming the child-rape mansion that is Mar-a-Lago? Who's head would get carried away on a pike? Miller's? Theil's? Musk's?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adhdsergio@lemmy.world 39 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Alright, time to bomb Cuba

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

What do you think the odds are of that happening, this year or next or whatever?

Keep in mind, this thing in Iran won't end. It might get hot and cold with ceasefires Israel routinely, if not daily, violates.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

After a successful op in Venezuela, he thought he could boost his rep with another one, and then blew it in Iran.

Now he'll want an easy win to redeem himself, and he'll go all in on Cuba, with troops and everything, figuring it will be a walk in the park since it's right off the coast.

But he'll fuck it up, and kill lots of American troops, and innocent Cubans, and even the American Cubans will get pissed off, and he'll be in an even worse situation than before.

Never underestimate his ability to totally fuck up EVERYTHING.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Initial military success in regard to Venezuela. When the Venezuelan people realize how badly they are getting shafted, they will rebel and take control of their oil again.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 13 hours ago

The Iran situation is going to end the same way as Afghanistan. USA will declare job done and just leave, leaving the mess for others to sort out. Oil production will ramp up elsewhere where it's suddenly profitable to extract because of the higher prices which will eventually find a new balance. Israel will kill a lot of people domestically and play the victim.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

What do you think the odds are of that happening, this year or next or whatever?

Feels like an October Surprise moment, especially if Republicans are worried about losing in Florida.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Ah yes, Florida Cuban expats playing the old abuser card:

If I can't have her, no one can.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Republicans aren't worried about losing Florida it's on lock as I understand it.

But yeah, right before the elections is not a bad guess. I think it would hurt them more than help, but if they manufactured a pretext and did something right before the election before it became clear this was more hamfisted leadership it might not hurt.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Republicans aren’t worried about losing Florida

Their approval rating has been underwater for months, even in that cursed state.

But yeah, right before the elections is not a bad guess. I think it would hurt them more than help, but if they manufactured a pretext and did something right before the election before it became clear this was more hamfisted leadership it might not hurt.

The US media does a great job of taking everything Trump says at face value and in the best possible framing for about three weeks after he says it, and then running a bunch of "Can't believe y'all let Lucy trick you with that football again" articles once the latest fuckery is in the rearview mirror.

[–] optimisticturtle@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Their approval rating has been underwater for months, even in that cursed state.

He made gains with Hispanics then proceeded to sic ICE on them. Now many are conservative as hell and have their own issues with colorism and racism, but I am curious to see how this plays out in 2028.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Imagine being so fucking stupid you believe a republican would do anything positive for anyone but themselves.

You’re already mentally brain dead if you think a democrat would ever help you, you’ve got to be literal rotting zombie flesh puppeted by the propaganda of pedophiles to believe a word a republican says.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

believe a word a republican says

"Increase the federal minimum wage to $15 across the country and eliminate the minimum tipped wage." ~Joe Biden

not even one standalone bill. they only needed a majority. They skip super majority requirements all of the time with a majority vote, they've done it hundreds of times (it's a parliamentary rule only and not the law).

[–] adhdsergio@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

As an armchair general I would guess before midterms if they are set to lose (and if losing means they won't be able to start a new invasion), and after if not. But in any case Cuba isn't much of a challenge compared to Iran, so it won't be hard to invade, militarily speaking