this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
1072 points (96.9% liked)

me_irl

7931 readers
1468 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 95 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

He was asked what portion of gun crimes were by trans people, and he retorted with "are we counting gang violence?"

So he was losing an argument about trans people and was trying to shift to blaming black people.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Charlie died the way he lived. Spewing bullshit.

[–] yarrage@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Brainfart you mean?

I'll see myself out

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

and grifting, and railing against the people who were funding him. his antisemitism was becoming problematic for his backer of TPUSA. most notabally hosting tucker carlson on his shows,interviews.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Equating gang violence with black people is racist as shit.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Admittedly that dog whistle was an assumption I made. He didn't finish his thought.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Indeed. It's a common dogwhistle the conservative talking heads have entrenched in modern discourse. Obviously, white gangs exist, but the act of mentioning gang violence while talking to a predominantly young, white crowd will water the seed in their mind that the other is the problem.

Take a look at any Fox News segment that covers gang violence. Guarantee any mugshots or arrest videos shown during such segments do not show ANY white detainees. It's deliberate. If they ever show a white person arrested, they will absolutely frame the segment differently, and won't utter that phrase.

Since the "war on drugs" designed to target minorities is less effective now, they branched out to calling it the war on gang violence.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 15 points 1 week ago

He was asked what portion of gun crimes were by trans people, and he retorted with “are we counting gang violence?”

All those trans gang members out there committing gun crimes! Why ... there's probably nearly half a dozen of them in the country!

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Naw are you serious? Kirk was asked how many mass shootings occurred in the last 10 years and he responded briefly with counting or not counting gang violence bs.

Regardless, what in the world made you feel the need to gaslight us about it being a trans specific question that preceded the shooting. Also total bullshit on your part.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

In the run up to that question they were discussing trans mass shooters, then the questionnaire pivoted to mass shootings in general (to show that trans shooters are a tiny tiny minority) which Kirk then tried deflecting by asking about gang or non-gang related shootings.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Theoretically I'm sure some trans people are in gangs, especially given how v coding probably heavily pressures trans prisoners into prison gangs, but as someone who's known a ton of trans people I feel we're disproportionately likely not to be perpetrating gang violence all else being equal