this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
314 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29876 readers
2103 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They may not have the gavels yet, but House Democrats are laying the groundwork for a number of investigations into Donald Trump should they win control of Congress in November.

Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif. — who’s set to chair the House Oversight Committee in a Democratic majority — told MS NOW that his team is “already preparing and gearing up.”

“We’ve got a team on Epstein, we have a team on [Trump] family corruption, we have a team on DHS and ICE,” Garcia said. “Those teams are actively working on preparation, letters, research.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

If they want to be trusted again they should investigate Bidens ignoring of the Leahy laws as well. we need to be a nation of laws again and that means going after everyone who breaks the law whether they are in your party or in office or not.

Everyone of every party who has supported this genocide belongs impeached, in shackles, and in jail. Our standing laws say so.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I completely agree, but I want to emphasize something. That "AS WELL" is putting in a lot of work in this sentence man...

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are insane if you think Trump will see any repercussions. At all.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is 100% going to pardon himself. And I have little confidence that the courts will stop him. They will talk about history and tradition when it suits them, but I can totally see them making an exception for yet another unprecedented action.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Even if Trump doesn't pardon himself, the next asshole will pardon him to "help heal the rift between two camps".

No president, ever, has been held accountable for various corruptions and war crimes.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look into Schmuck Schumer, too. He only cares about Israel and Insider Trading, so it wouldn't surprise me at all if he was MAGA bought. He couldn't have been less effective if he was working for MAGA.

[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

what kills me about Schumer et al is that i was always taught that dual loyalty is an antisemitic trope because it's founded on essentialism. The idea that someone might hold a loyalty to another country over their own based on their ethnicity is an unjust assumption, and it hurts American Jews (and their communities, and by extension yourself, as a member of their community) because as a group they really just want to get by, same as anyone else. They are our neighbors and our friends, and they want whats good for their homeland just like you and me. Jewish Americans are just Americans who happen to be Jewish.

But it seems like everyone in the ruling class has decided that actually dual loyalty is part of being Jewish, and that actually you're the antisemitic one for pointing it out, and that furthermore antizionist jews are antisemitic for their unjewish behavior.