this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
20 points (88.5% liked)

Flippanarchy

2489 readers
1529 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I made a post on hierarchy a month ago but I have some more specific questions now.

I've been hit with the claim that mass production industries that are needed today would not be possible without a hierarchy. That due to regional limitations and the logistics of smartphone manufacturing, technology cannot be produced on the needed scale without a hierarchy of managers.

This is quoted in PCB fabrication, as well as other areas such as medicine and other mass produced goods.

It is also said that managers are needed for efficiency, though I don't understand that.

Because the anarchist movement, abolishing hierarchy, "runs counter" to the "global direction of humanity and progress", it is acclaimed to being "doomed to failure" and "idealist".

What would be the anarchist response to this? Would appreciate detailed responses and/or resources.

I want to improve my anarchist understanding

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Saw a take that "billionaires are needed to stimulate the economy" a few days ago. The funniest part is they specifically meant Chinese "socialism" when writing that.

[–] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lmao. If there is some useful function that billionaires do, then you should be able to emulate it in a democratically controlled way without enriching individuals.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago

Oh so we all need to be pedophiles in an anarchist society? Thanks. Thanks so much.

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

Which was my point in response, yeah. There's nothing of value they provide that can't be done without creating a massive wealth inequality.