this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
462 points (93.3% liked)

Trans Memes

3025 readers
488 users here now

A place to post memes relating to the transgender experience.

Rules

  1. Follow lemmy.blahaj.zone community guidelines.
  2. Posts must be trans related.
  3. No bigotry.
  4. Do not post or link to pornography.
  5. If a post is tagged with a specific gender identity, keep the conversation centered on that identity.
  6. Posts that assume the viewer’s gender and/or contain potentially triggering content must be spoilered and tagged at the beginning of the post title. Example content-warning tags that you can copy include the following:
  1. Mods can be arbitrary.

Because it apparently has to be said, this community is supportive of all forms of DIY HRT.

Recommendations

  1. Include other tags in posts for example:
  1. Include image description when possible.
  2. Link to source

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
BiNonBi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
0x2640@lemmy.blahaj.zone
462
She wants us dead πŸ™ƒ (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 day ago by TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/transmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 104 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I dropped literally everything in your list for the reasons you outlined (except WoW, which I dropped before I knew anything about Blizzard).

But Rowling is worse than them.

Corporations are amoral, and entirely self serving. They will fuck over anyone if it earns the corporation a profit.

Rowling is not amoral. Rowling is driven by hate, and her goal is not self interest, and her harm is not indiscriminate. Her harm is targeted and deliberate, and she explicitly uses her visibility to normalise and encourage harm to the people she is targeting.

And deliberate targeted hate that tries to create more hate is worse than amoral self interest.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago

Rowling is not amoral. Rowling is driven by hate, and her goal is not self interest, and her harm is not indiscriminate. Her harm is targeted and deliberate, and she explicitly uses her visibility to normalise and encourage harm to the people she is targeting.

Don't forget to drop the mic after dropping bars like that.

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. Intentionality matters. It's the difference between killing someone through accident and carelessness (like a distracted driver causing a car accident) and malice (arranging to deliberately run someone over with your car.) One is a crime like manslaughter, the other is first degree murder. Intention is everything in law and morality.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago

I'd argue that a company is more like someone not caring if it runs anyone over or not than someone who accidentally ran someone over. Wilful disregard rather than carelessness. But international harm is still worse than either