this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
375 points (99.5% liked)

News

37661 readers
2205 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

FYI 45 kph on a non-motorized bicycle is not really "freakishly fast", that's a normal downhill speed on your average middle age guy's weekend workout. And I think this concern is already addressed by signed speed limits.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's also not a speed you hit on a pedestrian walkway between intersections with crossings where you have to look out for cars or pedestrians stepping in front of you.

I think the most I've ever clocked on a bicycle was 56 km/h (as I didn't usually ride with a speedometer and me being in good enough shape to do that without having to go downhill was before I had a phone with a decent enough battery to run Strava or something for every little ride), but that was out of town, on a straight road. On a pedestrian walkway that requires me to stop or slow down every hundred or two hundred meters, it would take effort to even consistently hit 25 km/h. But with a motor assisting you, you can hit higher speeds much quicker.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why are you biking on a pedestrian walkway? That seems like it's own seperate problem.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Uh most people don't cycle in car lanes unless going very fast.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where do you live? I'm in the US where almost all vehicles, including cyclists, ride in the street and only car drivers refer to them as "car lanes".

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Estonia. Bicycles are allowed on either the light traffic road, or the car lanes. You're not supposed to go very fast around pedestrians if you opt for the former, but a lot of people (teenagers mostly) do anyway. That's why I'm saying an e-bike that can do 45 km/h should be considered a moped, and be restricted to being used on the road where cars go. In fact that's how it is here. An e-bike that's considered a light traffic vehicle is only allowed to assist until 25 km/h. This is also what California seems to be doing, with higher speeds requiring a license plate and the class 1 vehicles getting restricted.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Here in the states we don't have a "light traffic road" as you describe. That's just not a thing in our infrastructure. This situation would be easier to resolve if we did.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fair enough. Yeah if all e-bikes are going to be sharing the road with cars anyway, I can see why it wouldn't make sense to limit unlicensed ones to 25 in your case. But at the same time, it makes sense that if a vehicle is capable of speeding, it should have a license plate on it and require the user to be 18. No?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes and a driver's test, like any other licensed vehicle. What I would oppose are speed capping the vehicles themselves or outright banning them, as I think both of those "solutions" are more in service to the automotive industry than anything else. And throws the baby out with the bath water, so to speak.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Well, nobody's outright banning them luckily, and only the ones that don't require a test are being capped AFAIK. If your ebike is registered as a motorcycle, it requires a driver's test and doesn't need to have the speed capped at all.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, if it can go over the speed limit I agree. However I cannot.