this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
971 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

20058 readers
3113 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, there's two things to consider.

One is just how many folks "self diagnose". Rather than a stigma being reduced, it's often held up as a trait of superiority to the "normies", so some folks will assert it. There's a fine line to walk between unfair stigma versus unjustified glorification. The internet is full of this.

Two is that ultimately, there's room for being subjective even among professionals. See the parents of a kid that my kid was friends with. They lamented they got told by 5 psychologists that their kid was not autistic before they finally found one that "correctly" saw the kid's autism. They were so excited to have proof that their kid was one of those autistic folks that are super smart...

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago

One is just how many folks "self diagnose".

I'm not sure this would count towards any statistics of over-diagnosis though, as a self-diagnosis isn't a diagnosis.

Two is that ultimately, there's room for being subjective even among professionals.

This is true. Ultimately it's humans judging humans and there will be errors in the process.

[–] julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 20 hours ago

Good example. It‘s not only about how many people take a test, but also if the test is taken multiple times. Then you are in realm of statistics.

Probably to find the true result would be to consult those earlier doctors with the diagnosis of that last doctor. They might have missed something (or not).