this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
755 points (99.1% liked)
Microblog Memes
11874 readers
1373 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No2 will make any interviewer exclude you as they don't want to hire a "lemon"
Lemon is right...but not because they have medical problems. I'm left as hell but I'd get so annoyed if an interview candidate snapped back like that. I'd think "this person is going to escalate any minor inconvenience"
It's because they have boundaries.
No, it's because of how they choose to respond to a tiny bit of friction.
They're the type of person who wouldn't take 2 minutes to help you with something that's not explicitly outlined in their job description.
Yeah.
Boundaries.
A completely inflexible person.
Someone who isn't willing to be taken advantage of.
Someone who thinks helping out with something is "being taken advantage of"
Someone with a persecution complex.
Professional victim.
The type of person called their mom hitler growing up because she told you to clean your room.
Someone who thinks that working off the clock is "helping out with something."
I'm a bit embarrassed...I thought you were talking to me and the point I was making.
So what else did the strawman say that you want to get mad about?
I thought constructing strawmen was what we were doing.
Every description I gave was for the type of person who would say "that's not in my job description" if a coworker asked to help them with a task.
You know, the specific example I've been talking about in this entire comment chain?
Don't show up in my replies arguing against a point I'm not making and then act like I'm the one off base.
And the description I gave was of the type of employer who doesn't respect the boundaries of his employees.
And uses their "attitude" as an excuse.
You see why that's a strawman, right? I'm not talking about employers asking people to stay late. I'm talking about coworkers who say "training isn't in my job description" when you ask them to show you how to do something.
And I'm talking about employers because they're the ones who consider themselves entitled to ignore employee protections.
Yeah, so...this whole comment chain is about how people like that make shitty coworkers. You don't get to switch it up, exaggerate, and be like "well actually I was talking about this other thing the whole time"
Catch you in another thread, I think we're good here
Thread started with talking about a job interview.
Acting their wage.
Helping out your coworkers on a one-off thing is just a thing normal people do. People like you are insufferable
People who live to work are insufferable. People who set work/life boundaries are not.
Your replies make me think you've never had a job with coworkers. You're so caught up in the anti-capitalist mindset and apparently don't realize there's a HUMAN BEING struggling.
Just let someone struggle for an hour instead of taking 2 minutes to help. That's how we do things here on the left, right?
Get a grip, man. Join us in the real world.
How do you know I don’t help coworkers? You’re blindly jumping to conclusions because I won’t let my job take advantage of me.
I never said anything about coworkers.
Forgive me, I thought you were the guy I've been arguing with who has been throwing insults toward people willing to help.
But still, saying no to helping a coworker for 2 minutes is not the same thing as setting a work/life boundary in the slightest. No one in this thread is arguing for overtime.
No worries mate; at the end of the day none of this matters. I don’t want to fight you about this, I want to fight my CEO who’s making an obscene amount of money for the value he’s generating. Hell, the whole C-Suite.
Coworker needs help? Sure thing, they’re in this slog with me.
It depends, I know people that would be glad to help on the work but will not tolerate out of work pondering. Gaps on the résumé are sort of more of the latter, imo
You know what I do when someone casually asks me a question I don't want to answer? I keep it vague and give them a chance to pick up the hint. I don't give them a stone cold "I'm not going to answer that." like a defensive weirdo.
Feels like a lot of people in this thread don't realize an interview is a conversation. Or they just don't know how to have a conversation...
Seems like they think conversations involve certain spells and invocations to force it to go the way they want. Like if you have a legal right, you must aggressively invoke it so your opponent realizes you're a legal mastermind and hands you the job to avoid lawsuits.
Feels kinda like that advice for interacting with cops that sounded more like "how to be legally right while escalating interactions with the police". Or the sovereign citizen version that drops the "legally right" part entirely.
It ignores the reality that anyone can judge you for any reason and that it's practically impossible to prove or even know why they reject you after an interview, so it doesn't even matter if they did it for an illegal reason as long as they didn't outright tell you (or each other in writing if you do try to sue, which btw if you sue someone over how a job interview goes, few will want to even interview you if they know about it, even if you're completely in the right).
Those "know your rights" videos are exactly what came to mind. Not only is it unnecessarily combative, you're showing your whole hand.
Knowing your rights is important. Telling someone you know your rights when they're not pressing you to abandon them is something else.
Also displaying dominance when you don't have it just shows that you won't be a pleasant person to interact with regularly. And the people trying to argue this point with you are proving the point more than anything else by treating the pushback of "you don't need to state that so defensively" as "forget your worker rights and boundaries, you're going to be a slave!"
While workers rights can be a trump card, you don't pull them out in an interview as most trump cards aren't in play yet.
I would hate to be interviewed by you, asking for respect of medical privacy is "snapping back"? No wonder it sucks so fucking much to find a new job.
Legalese style “I will not be discussing this matter any further” in an interview does give off future lawsuit vibes.
Yeah, a much more normal way to say that is “I was dealing with a medical condition. It’s no longer an issue, but it’s a bit personal, so I’d prefer if we didn’t get into more than that.”
I wouldn't even say that much. Any interviewer asking about a 'gap in my resume' is already coming off to me as a micromanaging cunt.
I mean, you asking to explain my medical history is lawsuit vibes.
"I didn't know this gap was for medical reasons" Why the fuck are you asking about a gap in my work history in the first place? What I did 5 years ago is irrelevant to this interview today.
It's so weird to draw weapons in response to that. Do you really always assume the absolute worst intent when someone asks open-ended questions? If so, it's hard to feel bad for you. You are one of the worst kinds of coworkers to have.
"Hey tocopherol, do anything fun this weekend?"
"How I spend my weekends is none of your business and I'm offended that you even though asking was appropriate!"
"Ok dude have fun sitting in your car at lunch"
Yeah it's much better to begin with a more polite "It was medical in nature and I'd prefer not to discuss it." And only pull out the "hey, legally you can't ask about my medical issues" if they continue.
Thank you. You're one of the only people in my replies who gets what I'm saying lol
Other people are acting like the interviewer is demanding answers.
An interview works both ways. If that's how they consider humans, then you dodged a bullet.