this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
599 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

11397 readers
2512 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

No, it's because of how they choose to respond to a tiny bit of friction.

They're the type of person who wouldn't take 2 minutes to help you with something that's not explicitly outlined in their job description.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They’re the type of person who wouldn’t take 2 minutes to help you with something that’s not explicitly outlined in their job description.

Yeah.

Boundaries.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

A completely inflexible person.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Someone who isn't willing to be taken advantage of.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Helping out your coworkers on a one-off thing is just a thing normal people do. People like you are insufferable

[–] captcha@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It depends, I know people that would be glad to help on the work but will not tolerate out of work pondering. Gaps on the résumé are sort of more of the latter, imo

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

You know what I do when someone casually asks me a question I don't want to answer? I keep it vague and give them a chance to pick up the hint. I don't give them a stone cold "I'm not going to answer that." like a defensive weirdo.

Feels like a lot of people in this thread don't realize an interview is a conversation. Or they just don't know how to have a conversation...

[–] hosma@lemmy.world -2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think a more productive and empathetic approach would be to probe such a person on practical job-relevant hypotheticals of a similar nature, in order to actually get an idea of how they would handle those situations - if that's really what you're worried about. Why be so quick to label people negatively based solely on personal boundaries? Do you think it's better to skirt one's way around an issue than to address it?

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Why be so quick to label people negatively

Because time is limited and they're not the only candidate.

based solely on personal boundaries?

Literally nothing to do with them HAVING boundaries. Why are so many replies acting like I'm not talking about their attitude? Replace the question with anything the interviewer doesn't have the right to know.

"I see you've mostly worked in [other state], what brought you out here? Certainly not the weather, haha"

"I am not required to disclose my whereabouts or reason for travel outside of my work hours"

Sounds like a person I'd want on my team for sure.

[–] hosma@lemmy.world -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That sounds to me like someone who doesn't want to be stepped all over in the name of having a career, and it also sounds like you're impatiently skipping over people while also paradoxically expecting to understand everything about who they are from a singular and very limited interaction.

During a job interview, you evidently see people as an abstract mesh of characteristics that you believe you can deduce their entire identity from, and similarly they mostly see you as a mere abstract mechanism of the company. I'm sure that such a candidate would be happy to answer more personal questions over a stress-free cup of coffee, feeling like they're chatting with a person instead of having to win over a corporate proxy.

I don't think anyone goes to a job interview expecting to be applying for friendship with the interviewer, but to have their relevant skills evaluated first and foremost. It's perfectly normal to find anything else extremely weird and needlessly intrusive and to reserve one's right to privacy and go look for another, saner workplace.

It's just about the same issue as with chat control. You also haven't addressed my other points, so I assume that what you actually value in the workforce is half-truths and facades.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I am not required to disclose my opinion on the last question of your previous comment. Please move on to the next question and do not use this robotic refusal as a clue to my character.

Annoying, right?

[–] hosma@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's your rightful choice, and it leaves me with my assumptions, but I just ask that you remember that this is still a casual conversation that we're having, and that I have no ulterior motives, and that my questions were on topic and driven by genuine curiosity in your way of thinking instead of a need to tick boxes. I don't know any side of you other than the one you're currently showing me; however, I understand that it most likely does not reflect the better part who you really are.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

The point is that there's a dozen other ways to say you're not sharing without sounding like you're guilty and talking to a cop. If they can't feign a bit of positively for an interview, I don't want to know what they're like on a Monday.

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip -2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Its a conversation that determines whether you can collect enough credits to have food and shelter. Defensiveness seems like a natural reaction, no?

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

I mean if you put it that way.... No? Why would your natural reaction be to sabotage yourself?

Are you this honest when they ask what your greatest weakness is?