this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
225 points (95.5% liked)

Europe

11018 readers
893 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SomeOneWithA_PC@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (6 children)

And the use case is only for visual appeal? Good for those who need that. Probably can add advertisement on it to make it cheaper? I'm fine with normal looking one. Maybe it is beneficial, as it might reduce the performance at first but might keep temperatures lower and so increases efficiency again? Solar power is just great and it should get to a point where there is no more question about if it is worth it and will just get added to every roof that gets sun.

[–] cnovel@jlai.lu 4 points 8 hours ago

In some cases, you are not allowed to install regular solar panel in my country. If you live near an historical monument, it can be impossible because it would clash with it. These solutions could be an alternative.

[–] alleycat@feddit.org 6 points 10 hours ago

Personal taste doesn't matter when you have to deal with American HOAs or the German Denkmalschutz (Monument Protection Agency). This tech is a godsend.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 9 hours ago

Solar power is just great and it should get to a point where there is no more question about if it is worth it

We are well past the point where there are any legitimate question marks over the efficiency and efficacy of solar panels. Unfortunately we don't live in a sane world we live in a world where politicians are being paid off by oil companies that are seen their industry evaporate.

The only place on earth where solar panels are probably not going to work is inside the Arctic circle where there is insufficient light for a well over half the year. But that's what the electrical grid is for you don't have to generate your power locally.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

There are plenty of people who seem to only manage to conjure up "but they're ugly" as reasons to not have panels and policy supporting their adoption

Sometimes it's worth something existing simply to reduce the arguments against it

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of people take pride in the appearance of their house, and solar panels could totally alter the appearance of a house, especially one designed in a particular architectural style.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, make it look cooler. Solar panels still look like fancy future tech to me. I'm always reminded of the ISS. So I stand by it, they just look cool.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago

to me

That's the issue right there.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

If they can find a way to make the panels usable and still have aesthetic appeal then they could be used for signage and shit too.

While I don’t say yay more signage I do say yay more solar, so like a lose-win

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 21 hours ago

The solar would be used to power the signage at night.

But it would also be more easily scavengeable....