this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
211 points (96.5% liked)

Green Energy

4298 readers
260 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 104 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Man, that is a hugely misleading headline when casually glanced over. Not 95% efficiency; 95% of other panels....

Typical panels are about 20-24% efficient. So these roof tiles are like 19-22.5%. Not bad.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Edit: didn't knew OP added the "compared to regular panels part". Disregard the rest of this comment.

I think is a good title, it's tells how compare against regular solar panels. Saying their absolute efficiency wouldn't really tell a lot because not everyone knows what means having a 20% efficiency.

[–] FearfulSalad@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 day ago

Colored solar panels that mimic tiles roof hit 95% efficiency compared to regular solar tiles

Do they hit 95% of regular solar tiles efficiency? Or do they hit 95% efficiency, while regular solar tiles hit (presumably) less?

It is a clickbait title because it offers more than one interpretation. One is reasonable (and correct), but not punchy. The other is outlandish (and wrong) but draws the reader in on the off chance that it might be right. Hence the subsequent disappointment in the headline.

If you only see the "correct" interpretation, more power to you: you weren't baited and thus had nothing to be disappointed by.

But the headline is, objectively, phrased to bait the click from a wide swath of readers who question if the "incorrect" interpretation just might be true.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)