this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
445 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

83990 readers
3270 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It takes most college students at least four years to earn a bachelor’s degree. Christie Williams finished in three months.

The North Carolina human resources executive spent two months racking up credits through web tutorials after work in 2024, then raced through 11 online classes at the University of Maine at Presque Isle in four weeks. Later that year, she went back to earn her master’s – in just five weeks. The two degrees cost a total of just over $4,000.

Since then, she has coached a thousand other students on how to speed through the state college, shaving off years and thousands of dollars from the usual cost of a degree.

“Why wouldn’t you do that?” Williams asked. “It’s kind of a no-brainer if you know about it.”

Many U.S. schools have been experimenting with ways to speed up traditional college programs to reduce the burgeoning cost and help students move into the workforce faster. Some offer three-year bachelor’s programs, reducing the number of credits needed for a diploma by one quarter. Many more allow students to enroll in college classes while still in high school.

But the breakneck pace of the fastest online programs concerns some academics, who say there is a big difference in what students can learn in weeks or months compared with three or more years.

The phenomenon – sometimes referred to as degree hacking, college speed runs or hyperaccelerated degrees – has spawned a cottage industry of influencers making videos about how quickly they earned their degrees and encouraging others to follow suit.

Supporters of the approach tout it as an affordable, convenient way for people to earn credentials they need for their careers. Others, including some online students and academic officials, expressed concern about what the super-accelerated students are missing, and whether a quick path devalues degrees.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I dont know how I feel about this.

On one hand, degrees are somewhat good for education in lots of industries.

On the other hand, I would fire someone instantly if they had cheated their degree like this.

Degrees are also very expensive.

I guess if it was a useless degree then it wouldn't matter in the first place.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

On the other hand, I would fire someone instantly if they had cheated their degree like this.

But all you're doing in that case is making them attend a community college with a bunch of wacky misfits for a few years.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

On the other hand, I would fire someone instantly if they had cheated their degree like this.

Ideally, I wouldn't hire them. But if they were already on the payroll, I'm much more interested in their work output than their transcript.

This is just the industrialization of "Fake It Until You Make It".

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I value honesty more than most people I'm realizing. If a hire is open about their credentials I would not care.

I've witnessed what happens when people are ok with liars. It's gross, and no one should normalize it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If a hire is open about their credentials I would not care.

Typically, any job that gets filled at my company has to have a competitive candidate to consider. I've seen them fudge this a few times (bringing in someone they know isn't qualified just to balance against), but it's a hiring standard that you have to consider at least two (preferably three or four) candidates for any position.

If you show up and you don't have the credentials for the position, you're simply not getting the job.

I’ve witnessed what happens when people are ok with liars.

Sure. The Enron offices are spitting distance from where I work.

But I also see a lot of people fudging resumes to get feet in the door. And I don't see people who were honest, but got screened out by a filter. So I'm the victim of selection bias, in many regards.

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Different life situations for everyone, I think.

I don't mean strictly professional honesty, but my experiences leak into how I view something like this. The biggest liar I know is still in jail for raping children, so I have a skewed view of honesty.

My industry and group are weird when it comes to credentials. We don't have a strict, you need this degree situation.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

The biggest liar I know is still in jail for raping children

I will happily spot you "Don't hire child rapists" as a rule of thumb. I think "fudging your resume is a slippery slope to sexually assaulting a minor" is a stretch of logic.

My industry and group are weird when it comes to credentials. We don’t have a strict, you need this degree situation.

I know employers who use "college degree" as a proxy for "capable of following instructions" and won't hire anyone without a bachelors.

I know employers who are much more fast and loose, bringing in anyone with "potential" as they broadly define it.

Idk exactly what the right answer is. But "powers through a MOOC in a few weeks to get a certificate that says I can competently execute a job" doesn't strike me as a moral failing.

[–] PurpleClouds@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

Degrees are very expensive in the us* most European countries the cost is much less. I think liberation of the yoke in the us is liberating to be honest. I think going to higher education physically however is more than just doing the content, but also doing the soft stuff — learning how to communicate clearly with others. This is lacking this, and then you have AI ofc which makes it difficult regardless

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

why would you fire them for this? that seems absurd. I make pretty good money and I don't have a degree at all

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Honesty is my problem with it. If they were open about it I wouldn't care. But if they hid it and were hired because of the degree I'd fire them almost regardless of their work.

It's something I value because dishonest people are usually quite horrible in my life experience.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

My assumption is that they would tell you where it's from, because normally the school's name is attached to the degree, right? it wouldn't be their fault if you didn't catch it

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We are all arguing different hypotheticals. My problem is my personal experiences.

One of them was a rapist. The other was a high level tech salesman child abuser. So I'm 2 for 2 and my opinions are skewed forever.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

those things have nothing to do with college education

[–] Bloodyhog@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Thats because you have the sellable skills, which is the most important thing. Degree is helpful in some areas, essential in others and has no use everywhere else (outside of proving that a person is capable of learning and persevering).

Cheating is not a sellable skill, and a huge red flag.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Cheating is absolutely a sellable skill.

[–] Bloodyhog@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Ok, you got me there. Probably not though if you try to lie to your potential employer.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 3 points 10 hours ago

How is it cheating? Who is being cheated? Out of what?

Reading the article, it sounds like these students still need to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the material.