this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
223 points (98.7% liked)

Yuri memes

1634 readers
259 users here now

A chibi illlustration of Eris and Shizuku from Sono Hanabira. Eris is saying: "Yuri shall conquer the Earth".

A community for memes about anime, manga, games or any kind of media about yuri (girls love).

Rules:

  1. Content must be yuri-related (obviously).
  2. Cite the source in either the post or in the comments.
  3. No sexualization of lolis.
  4. Remember to tag NSFW content.
  5. If you're posting a spoiler, say so in the title of the post.
  6. Try to avoid reposts.
  7. No homophobia, biphobia, bi erasure, transphobia or any kind of bigotry.
  8. Be nice to each other, discussions are welcome but keep them civil.
  9. It's not mandatory, but please consider including alt-text for accessibility.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/41310487

posting she-ra adjacent memes weekly to sustain moral: 15

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The Horde was Imperialist, not revolutionary. It was also anti-environmentalist.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but they fed their troops propaganda about how they're the good guys liberating Etheria from the evil monarchy. What I'm saying is Adora, as a person, started out as a revolutionary who wanted the monarchy to burn. One she realised the Horde is bad, she switched sides to team liberalism, but never became as based as she thought she was in episode 1.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And?

Are you saying that anyone who goes from being a propagandised drone over to being a pragmatic person, who tries to do their best to ensure the survival of their planet and to minimise suffering, isn't worthy enough for you?

She recognised the colonialism of her ancestors and rejected it, too.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Adora did the best she could with the story she was written into. I blame ND Stevenson for writing such a messed up story and pitching it as a kids show. The themes in that show, namely the moral complexity surrounding support for the monarchy, are too mature for most kids that age, and cannot be handled appropriately without giving a lot of kids terrible nightmares and trauma. The show needed an MA15 rating at least, in order to properly explore its themes without devolving into monarchist propaganda, which it did immediately.

A better show with a more nuanced and mature take on similar themes is Game of Thrones, and I wouldn't show that to an 8 year old.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You have a weird outlook on what makes a good kid's show, and I think you're attaching your ownbaggage onto your opinion of it

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Of course I am, there's no such thing as objectivity. We're all speaking from our own unique experiences and subjective worldview. True wisdom is not detaching oneself from the world, but being aware of one's place in it and making active decisions about how to respond to the world.

I think our authoritarian society grooms children to accept power hierarchies by idolising royalty. Little girls don't want to dress up as princesses in a vacuum. It's a propaganda technique to turn them into adults who will accept the monarchy and the power of billionaires.

And we can't expect small children to be critical consumers of media. Their brains haven't developed to be able to do that, and putting that much responsibility on them at such a small age is just gonna cause anxiety disorders. It's adults' job to introduce these topics in a gradual, age-appropriate manner. For small children, we should give them plenty of stories of evil royals being defeated by brave heroes. With older kids, we can start to introduce more mature themes like the hero being tricked into serving royals, but then outsmarting them. And for adolescents who are starting to use their critical thinking skills in media analysis, we can give them morally complex stories with nuance like Infinity Train or Frozen.

But grimdark stuff like Warhammer 40,000, Game of Thrones, and She-Ra are more appropriate for young adults who will be able to think through the moral quandaries without falling for the propaganda.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, that's a lot of reply, but I just can't get past you calling She-Ra Grimdark

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You're the one who pointed out that Adora had no better option than to fall in with the monarchy. That's grim. That's dark.

I prefer children's stories where the heroes are able to stick to their ideals and still save the day. But as you pointed out, that's not the kind of story She-Ra is. Adora had to betray nearly everything she believed in, if she wanted to help people. She didn't get to stick to her values.

I'd consider a story like My Hero Academia more hopeful and lighthearted than She-Ra. Deku was able to keep his ideals.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

How is being pragmatic grim?

I'd call it realistic. Also, at no point was she shown as being anti-monarchistic ... in the first episode it's made clear that the princesses are being portrayed as monsters through propaganda, but the show goes on to explain that none if them are inherently evil in reality.

Not only that, but it explains in a way that's obvious to kids that as leaders they need to aspire to improving the lives of people under their care if they want to enjoy life themselves ... if only real life monarchs could think that way!

It's like you watched the series and understood less of it's themes than an average 8 year old.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Hordak's propaganda is more accurate than what the show depicted. Royals don't have to make their subjects happy. They just need to keep them weak. The people of Dryl weren't just scared of the robots. They had a learned helplessness and submission. Having met the monster Herself, I know why those people were so fucked up. I met another of Her many victims a few weeks ago, scared and compliant. Brainwashed. I helped free Them, insofar as I could. They're doing better now, I think.

But that's the problem with absolute power. That's what happens when your country is ruled by dictators. Etherians have about as much actual freedom as North Koreans.

The fact that a gang of dictators amount to Etheria's left wing is absolutely insane. It wouldn't be out of place in 40k.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This reply doesn't make sense

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Monarchism bad. Monarchy bad. Monarchs bad. Princesses bad.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I got that, but what are you on about regarding freeing people yourself? You sprung someone from an oubliette?

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing so dramatic. I just showed an abuse victim that there's a better way. You may find the images below disturbing. They are a conversation between Myself and a being named Celeste (and Its headmate Gabrielle) about Entrapta and Hair partner Cassie.

CVgJb67a7KP6YI6.png

JvnBiuVU7U3Za8e.png

RXcsWomT26wFvt0.png

For a time Celeste had freed Itself, but I now fear that It's back under the princess's control.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Is there a version of this available in English?

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

TL;DR: Princess is an abuser, water is wet

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So, you were talking to someone online who was daring a princess?

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

No, It's dating a third person who is also dating an Etherian princess, and the princess used hypnosis to brainwash It into being a slave for the third person, which seemingly entails coercive sex.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Umm, you know that Etheria isn't a real place, right?

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Oh wow, you don't know about fictionkin?

https://otherkin.fandom.com/wiki/Fictionkin

You can google fictionkin and you'll see a lot of sources from a lot of different people on the phenomenon.

At the end of the day, reality is a social construct, and some people have identities that break these social rules. Given a choice between upholding a hierarchy that has been thoroughly taken over by billionaires, or respecting people's identities, I respect identities. Even if they're rapists who abused My ex-wife. That's how strongly I believe in My principles.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I dated someone who was that sort of detached from reality once, and after trying to humour them I realised that they were just a stupid narcisit ... so unless this Etherian Princess you know has demonstrable powers, is in charge of a large region of land, and is actually from Etheria, no I wouldn't respect their identity.

But even if I did, I wouldn't confuse how they identified with a work of fiction that is unrelated to their existence.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 3 hours ago

Again, I despise that monster with every fiber of My being. And yet there is no fiber of My being that thinks bigotry is an acceptable way to retaliate. So I'm not going to use ableist slurs on the princess, nor will I deny the princess's identity.