this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
510 points (98.9% liked)

News

37194 readers
1856 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“The last 10 years of Donald Trump worming his way into our brains have been weird,” said Stephen Colbert on Tuesday evening. “But yesterday might have been the weirdest weird that ever weirded. And I’ll just let this actual 100% real, we did not make this up or change this footage in any way, CSpan report sum up the times we’re living in.”

Colbert then played a clip of CSpan reporting that Trump took questions outside the White House after having McDonald’s delivered via the food delivery app DoorDash. Trump talked about a number of topics, including the war in Iran and a controversial AI-generated image he posted to Truth Social that depicted him as Jesus.

“Even CSpan can’t make that sound normal,” the Late Show host said. “If you just woke up from a coma and that report was the first thing you saw, you’d ask the doctor to put you back in.”

In a rare move, Trump has since deleted the image, but “the damage has been done”, with even some staunch supporters now wondering if he’s the Antichrist, at least according to a report from Wired. “It’s an interesting theological question,” said Colbert. “Who are any of us to judge whether – yes, yes he is.”

Over the weekend, Trump also posted a long message on Truth Social criticizing Pope Leo XIV, calling him “weak” and a “loser”.

“Why would you start a beef with the pope?” Colbert wondered, as according to a new NBC poll, Pope Leo leads most public figures in the US in approval ratings. “It’s gotta piss Trump off to learn that the most popular guy on the planet lives in a palace dripping with gold and wears an insane hat and it’s not him.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Pope Leo leads most public figures in the US in approval ratings.

In theory, could the Pope run for president (given that he’s a U.S. citizen by birth, etc.)?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States

Eligibility

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution sets three qualifications for holding the presidency. To serve as president, one must:

  • be a natural-born citizen of the United States;
  • be at least 35 years old;
  • be a resident in the United States for at least 14 years.[126]

A person who meets the above qualifications would still be disqualified from holding the office of president under any of the following conditions:

  • Under Article I, Section 3, Clause 7, having been impeached, convicted and disqualified from holding further public office, although there is some legal debate as to whether the disqualification clause also includes the presidential office: the only previous persons disqualified under this clause were three federal judges.[127][128]
  • Under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, no person who swore an oath to support the Constitution, and later rebelled against the United States, is eligible to hold any office. However, this disqualification can be lifted by a two-thirds vote of each house of Congress.[129] There is, again, some debate as to whether the clause as written allows disqualification from the presidential position, or whether it would first require litigation outside of Congress, although there is precedent for use of this amendment outside of the original intended purpose of excluding Confederates from public office after the Civil War.[130]
  • Under the Twenty-second Amendment, no person can be elected president more than twice. The amendment also specifies that if any eligible person serves as president or acting president for more than two years of a term for which some other eligible person was elected president, the former can only be elected president once.[131][132]

So, going down the list:

  • Pope Leo XIV was apparently born in Chicago, so he meets the natural-born citizen requirement.

  • Pope Leo XIV was born in 1955, so he's 70 and meets the 35 years of age requirement.

  • It looks like, checking other sources, that the 14 year resident is just a requirement for cumulative residency over one's life. Unless he has other things he did that Wikipedia doesn't mention, he was in the US until he joined a mission to Peru in 1981, so he should meet the residency requirement.

  • He has not been impeached and convicted, so he meets that requirement.

  • He has not rebelled against the US, so he meets that requirement..

  • He has not yet been elected to be President more than twice, so he meets that requirement.

According to WP, he's still a US citizen.

So I expect that he could. There are no restrictions on also being a foreign citizen (he is a citizen of Peru and Vatican City as well) or of not also being concurrently a foreign head of government.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He doesn't give off enough pedo energy to simultaneously be a priest and the US president.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Maybe he just hides it better than most?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

The issue with the majority of the Catholic Church wasn’t that they were pedos, it was that they weren’t willing to do anything about those within the church that were pedos. It’s not even limited to pedophilia, even; they turn a blind eye to many things that would cast the church in a bad light. Better to keep it in house and sweep it under the rug. I had an (adult) family member who was sexually harassed by the principal of the school she worked at. They sent everyone to sexual harassment training, including her, rather than deal with it appropriately. He was not fired.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Possibly. I guess my standards have been affected by how poorly the current pedo in chief hides it.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

I guess there are restrictions from the catholic church though

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

There are no restrictions [...] of not also being concurrently a foreign head of government.

This seems like this is going to be a weird problem for some future America

[–] Alandrus_Sun@ttrpg.network 15 points 3 days ago

"Maybe we can combat MAGA by creating Catholic theocracy."

Absolutely would be eligible

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

It's a rare but not unheard of scenario for a US citizen to serve as a foreign head of state. A brief read makes it sound like a thorny issue. The US could theoretically attempt to strip his citizenship. Sounds like there was a Supreme Court decision in 1980 that would make that difficult... but there is a new Supreme Court.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

The... the.. the PoPresident?

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I think that would probably fall flat on both sides, because the Pope is not supposed to meddle directly in human affairs just the spiritual, or something loosely to that effect.

However, it is an interesting thought experiment.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 20 points 3 days ago

the Pope is not supposed to meddle directly in human affairs

*looks at the entire history of the Papacy*

ಠ_ಠ

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

He could, yes. But let's remember america flipped its shit when a catholic simply won the office. It was claimed JFK would put the Vatican interests ahead of the country, and he took deliberate steps to distance himself. I couldn't begin to imagine what the response would be if Leo tried it.

Biden is Catholic too

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Probably, but I would think as leader of the Holy See he has more power than any individual nation leader does ... so why change?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See

[–] Zahtu@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

which Title would come first then? Mr. President Pope - Mr. Pope President?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just gotta go to initials then. Mr. P.P.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Canada has that one in the bag already. You gotta choose a different acronym.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 3 days ago

Just combine them into Presipope.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Depends on the role he is fulfilling. "President Leo" or "Pope Leo XIV" in the shortest forms, "President Pope Leo XIV" and "Pope Leo XIV, President of the USA" in slightly longer forms.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Exactly. Look at the full title of the King of England (who is also the king of each commonwealth nation AND the head of the Church of England)