this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
126 points (98.5% liked)

Work Reform

16066 readers
272 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel very conflicted about unions every time they come up, because it seems they should be dead-simply beneficial to workers. To me, that is the sole reason for their existence. But when I talk to people in unions in person and when I hear so many interviews, it doesn't seem to be so.

With the end of the recent JBS strike, I've seen a number of outlets talk about how the union itself brought in scabs. The deal they struck doesn't sound any better than the one they had that led to them striking.

How do unions end up so conflicted? Doesn't their funding come from membership? I've never had a union job, and being in a place where you can get fired for any reason, such as organizing, it seems to make it a very risk thing with a less than certain payoff. Can anyone with better insight share their experience?

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

That's because the labor movement in the US has been systematically suppressed for decades. Most surviving unions are what could be called "business unions" or class-collaborationist unions. They are corrupt and have leadership that cut deals with the employers, and union elections are intentionally manipulated to depress turnout, usually by keeping the rank and file in the dark about the schedule.