this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
87 points (77.0% liked)

Comic Strips

23290 readers
2708 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Now that this community has mods, I think we should come to something approaching a consensus on whether there should be a rule against posting "nice" comics from transphobic and other kinds of bigoted artists. People like Stonetoss and Jago who have a lot of innocent-looking relatable comics, but also post the most mean, bigoted propaganda.

And I'd like to present a third option besides yes and no: one might post comics from bigoted artists after removing the artist credit, if the mods think that's a good compromise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Anthropologists observe societies, writing about them dispassionately and adopting a non-interference, non-judgement policy.

At some point a group of academics decided they wanted to include moral discussions (particularly about their own society), on how things come to be a certain way, and how they could develop differently. Thus Sociology was born.

Anthropology still exists, Sociology eclipsed it, it didn't kill it. They're aspects of each other, not in competition.

This is the censorship debate in a nutshell. A community picks a side, and the other side is free to branch off. The choices here are: Comics can be anything, even 3D printed gun files, or porn! No limits! We're all here to just observe.

Or; we need to advocate some limits, some values. Some values are better for the world, and some are worse.

I believe the no-limits crowd have the less considered standpoint. No group is free from having standards and values. We already moderate, it's the nature of social groups with implicit rules and ideals.

In my opinion, we're here to do more than just observe the chaos. We adopt a stance. Improving the world as best we can. So we must decide what improves it, and what doesn't.

I don't think totally uncensored free speech improves the world. It still imposes a set of values that impact the world - even if advocates pretend that no choice has been made.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I am a firm believer in "There is no better disinfectant than sunlight."

I want to see the most vile aspects of people, I want it to be on full display so we know who they are, and we can counter them directly.

I think the algorithm has done a MASSIVE amount of damage by cordoning things off and creating little pockets of filth festering in darkness out of view until it overflows and spills out on us all.

[–] mlc894@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I firmly disagree. β€œThe way to stop Nazism is to let them talk more and let more people see a bunch of Nazi stuff” can be judged as nonsense by inspection.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That isn't how this works.

It doesn't start with the most vile filth. It starts with slightly edgy jokes, employs irony, and works slowly towards getting you to believe whatever racist slop they're selling. "The alt right playbook" was a youtube series from like a decade ago that covers some of this. I don't usually like youtube videos, but that one I make an exception for.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 10 hours ago

And yet the pipeline works because it's an "inside" thing, the more people who see and recognize the dog whistles the less likely it is to spread with people remaining unaware that is is.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You're mistaken in thinking "The Algorithm" is some objective equation. I can't stress this enough -

It's not.

It's a lever, a programatic tool billionaires can adjust to control public opinion. What's more there's evidence of this. Internal leaks from Facebook/Meta reported that they were fully aware certain types of commercial beauty standard promotions embeded in social media in an unmoderated fashion on their sites were inadvertently causing young girls to display suicidal ideation.

They didn't stop it (because of the ad profit). There's a whole two part podcast on this (and other forms of confirmed algorithmic damage here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIR0Kd27RhI ).

Likewise, YouTube prior to Trump's election were very much aware that their algorithm was leading young men through a pipeline to far-right ideas and Nazi content (again, this podcast episode discusses the news and facts of this case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IekScPTekz8 )

I CANNOT STRESS THIS ENOUGH, the idea that Sunlight will disinfect our views, is no-longer (and I believe the sources cited in those two podcasts show this), is no longer a viable opinion. It's really an abdication to a higher power, without anywhere NEAR enough awareness of what that "higher power" really is: A loaded version of free speech, where the richest promote and demote views that best suit their interests.

I'm not saying I have a solution, but it's really fucking important that we all strongly recognize the gravity and extent of the problem. Because people are now growing up in, and entire social circles are being actively politically groomed by these algorithms in a way that's never happened to this extent before.

The free market of ideas is a convenient LIE which benefits the wealthy and most people do not push back on at all (they see it as objective and impartial). We need far left radicalism but there are no billionaires interested in allowing that into their algorithmically walled gardens - where they control the "sunlight" of what your feed thinks is popular.

They aren't accusing the left of indoctrinating the young because it was happening. They were accusing them, because they were doing it themselves already, algorithmically.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 1 day ago

The "indoctrination" is just another Satanic Panic, the dumbest things you have ever heard being repeated enough by "trusted" sources it becomes fact to them.

It's Meta and Xitter now, though, not James Dobson on AM radio.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the algorithm has done a MASSIVE amount of damage by cordoning things off and creating little pockets of filth festering in darkness out of view until it overflows and spills out on us all.

This describes how society in general has handled all vices, since long before the Internet.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 1 day ago

Sadly accurate, but it has been wilful ignorance, now it is enforced by what the machines think we want to see.

I think it is worse now, than before, it was a lot easier to pick up that "other" newspaper than it is to break out of your algorithm.