this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
469 points (94.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

41778 readers
291 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have a population that reads at a fifth grade level.

This will be a problem in any form of democracy.

Any system which gives the people any power will run into problems if the majority of the population is very stupid.

I think the advantage of my system is that the people elected may be stupid, yes, but at least most of them won't be malicious. And, hopefully, improving the education system would be something they have interest in working on, which could help make the population less stupid over time.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are the limits on the powers of this Senate?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, that would be up to the constitution and the bill of rights ... which I'm not quite done drafting yet.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I will only vote for this constitutional if it explicitly enshrines the write to the private ownership of alligators in any quantity, with exceptions for explicit standards of cruelty to alligators, which also must be written into the constitution explicitly. There should also be some language that states a dozen different ways that "alligator" isn't some metaphor for government power, and that we're talking about the literal animal here.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah ... not likely, lol. It's already way too long, what with me trying to exclude every loophole and account for every edge case, so I'm trying to keep it more general and let the Senate pass their own laws when it comes to very specific things that aren't absolutely essential for human rights and/or the running of a fair and equitable government.

Best of luck, though. I'll be rooting for you to get selected for the Senate, where you can spend your entire 10-year term exclusively fighting for alligator ownership rights.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, there's ways to introduce the proper amount of crazy in fewer words. For example, such as a constitutional ban on the color yellow.