this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
25 points (93.1% liked)

OpenChristian

200 readers
1 users here now

(Formerly Lemm.ee)

This is a community for progressive Christians and friends to discuss our faith, support each other, and share inspiration for our spiritual journeys.

We seek God's message of Peace, Love, and Grace through following the Spirit of Christ.

Also check out our sister Christian Music Community: https://lemmy.ca/c/christian_music?dataType=Post

There you'll be able to find Christian related music content.

OpenChristian Subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenChristian/s/K3NwAgNj2a

Wiki: https://reddit.com/r/OpenChristian/w/index

FAQ: [https://reddit.com/r/OpenChristian/w/faq]

[Lemmy mirror of FAQ] https://lemmy.world/post/32102984

Online Resources: https://reddit.com/r/OpenChristian/w/onlineresources

Community Rules

  1. No bigotry or oppressive rhetoric.

All misogyny, racism, antisemitism, LGBTQ+phobia, etc. will result in removal and a permanent ban. This includes commenting that LGBTQ¢+ love or relationships are sinful. Be aware that using “Pharisee” as a negative slur is considered anti-Semitic.

1b. Side B folks are welcome, but follow Rule 1. If you are a Side B Christian, please respect Rule 1 above, but know that you belong here and we want you to participate.

  1. Do not promote oppressive/harmful ideology.

This includes all attempts to promote or normalise hate, shame, or fear within Christianity (e.g. purity culture, scaremongering against gender-transitioning, “complementarianism’”, or “demonic” attacks).

  1. No sectarianism.

Legitimate criticism of other Christians/Faiths is allowed but refrain from prejudice against entire denominations/groups, and against other religions (e.g. Islamophobia).

  1. No disparaging Christianity

This is primarily a supportive space for anyone who identifies as Christian. While everyone is welcome to participate we ask that no one disparages Christianity.

  1. Be respectful and polite.

No personal attacks or accusations, harassment, misrepresentation of others, or insults. This also includes forcing debate, gatekeeping, and denying the validity of another's faith.

  1. Don't be a Troll, or a Jerk.

Don't concern Troll, play Devil's Advocate, or pretend to be confused when you really just want to start a debate. This Rule will be interpreted at the moderators’ discretion.

  1. No spamming or proselytizing

Don't post here if you're mass posting to other Communities. Don't post here for self-promotion unless it's particularly relevant to this subreddit. This is not your soapbox, and we are not here for you to preach at us. If you want to promote your media please ask permission from the mods.

  1. Be sensitive about linking to triggering content.

Because we want this space to be as safe as possible, we discourage posting images or links to oppressive rhetoric from others. However, we do understand that venting is important sometimes. If you must post something potentially triggering, mark it nsfw or use spoiler tags, and censor any identifying information.

  1. Discussion of the ongoing israeli-Palestinian conflict is temporarily prohibited.

This topic has proven to be too divisive to discuss without consistently violating this Community’s rules. In order to maintain peace and to continue supporting one another, content regarding the ongoing Israel-Palestinian conflict is not permitted at this time.

Notice:

OpenChristian is inclusive, open and welcoming of all. We are LGBTQ+ affirming, but we welcome any who have chosen celibacy, as long as you respect Rule 1.

Do not post or comment about how you believe homosexuality is a sin.

We have heard this a thousand times, and you have nothing new to contribute to the conversation.

If you do this, you will be banned.

Please note that as a progressive Christian community, we are explicitly followers of Christ, as well as LGBTQ+ affirming and egalitarian.

Friends are very welcome to participate, no matter what you believe.

But this is not the place for questioning or debating these positions.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Pacrat173@lemmy.world
Teknevra@lemmy.ca
RicoPeru@lemmy.blahaj.zone
25
"Satan" is a job title, not a name — and an anime figured this out before most churches did (lemmy.ca)
submitted 3 months ago by Teknevra@lemmy.ca to c/open_christian@lemmy.ca
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Something that's stuck with me for a while: the word Satan isn't actually a name.

It's a Hebrew title or role — ha-satan (הַשָּׂטָן) — meaning adversary, accuser, opponent, or something like a prosecuting judge. It's a function, not an identity.

Yet in most contexts I've encountered (ie books, horror movies, etc), "Satan" gets used as if it's just a synonym/unanimous for the Devil, or interchangeable with Lucifer, Beelzebub, etc.

That's a bit like calling someone "the Prosecutor" as if that is their name — rather than their role.

What's interesting to me is that this distinction actually shows up in the Hebrew Bible pretty clearly.

In Job, ha-satan reads more like a member of the divine council with a specific adversarial function, not a singular embodiment of evil.

The conflation with Lucifer (itself a mistranslation/interpretation from Isaiah 14) seems to have happened gradually through later Christian tradition.

Weirdly/funnily enough, the anime High School DxD — of all things — actually handles this more accurately than most sermons/media I've seen / heard.

The show uses titles like "Satan Lucifer," "Satan Leviathan," "Satan Asmodeus," and "Satan Beelzebub," treating Satan as a rank or title held by different individuals rather than a single being's name.

(Link for the curious: https://highschooldxd.fandom.com/wiki/Four_Great_Satans)

I'm curious how people here think about this.

Do you draw a distinction between Satan-as-title and Satan-as-entity in your own faith or reading of scripture?

Has the blurring of that line had any theological consequences worth examining?

Not trying to be provocative — genuinely just a concept I think deserves more attention.

SOME MORE INFORMATION:

https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/bible-interpretation/who-is-satan/

https://hebrewwordlessons.com/2019/06/16/satan-adversary-is-not-a-name/

https://www.bereanunderground.org/p/satan-in-hebrew-bible

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I could not locate Jesus calling himself Lucifer - only "the morning star" which comes from a different Latin word than Lucifer's Latin word despite translating to the same thing.

[–] NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

It's the same thing. Lucifer isn't a name or proper title or anything, just a kinda symbolic claim. It's a reference to Venus, having a different symbolic meaning depending on when/who you ask. I guess it's important to contextualize the book of Revelation as apocalyptic literature, being much less about predictive prophecy and more about revelatory prophecy. Revelation relies very very heavily on the Old Testament(probably the LXX) as a source. So in Jesus referring to himself as the "true Lucifer", it can be seen as a correction of the claims made in Isaiah by the devil, calling himself the bright morning star.

As for the whole Latin thing, well. So Isaiah was originally written in ancient Hebrew and the text the author of Revelation would have probably used for the Old Testament was Greek(LXX). Revelation would have also been in Greek. None of the original texts would have used Lucifer. However, the texts in question do use the symbology of Venus and could technically use Lucifer if they want to translate to Latin. I think a good portion of the confusion comes from the KJV's translation of Isaiah 14:12 just straight up saying Lucifer. For that translation, I agree with the sentiment, but strongly disagree with the execution since this should be an English translation for one, but more importantly shouldn't impose Latin symbology on ancient Hebrew symbology that will have a different take. Either way, they all refer to the symbology of Venus as the "bright morning star", hence my correction using the vernacular of the misconception.

And, just a little semi-related thing here that I think is interesting in considering the evolution of religion over time: the original passage in Isaiah 14 was really only talking about the Babylonian king, most likely Nebuchadnezzar II. It's kind of a Christian 'retcon' to include the devil as the subject in the passage. Many of the early Patristic fathers of Christianity were pretty adamant about opposing the view that it's about the Babylonian king and the devil, but eventually the Christian remytholization became the majority view, even up to this day.