this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
375 points (97.5% liked)

Not The Onion

20977 readers
2083 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Because the law is still valid? If you consider the law stupid, do something against it.

I personally don't consider it stupid to forbid driving under influence, regardless of the means.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus -5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Because the law is still valid?

Are you asking me or telling me? Because either way no it isn't. Laws are bullshit and you should break them just on principle.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, all of them? You don't think that sometimes, it's good for some things to not be allowed?

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

does it not "being allowed" mean it won't happen?

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In the case of this gentleman, I suppose not. However, I believe that driving after consuming drugs that impede your ability to drive should have a punishment of some kind. It is a matter of public safety. It's irresponsible to drink and drive, it's irresponsible to be on heroin while driving.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 1 points 8 hours ago

Agreed. But it should be your own morality that prevents that. A law shouldn't even be something you consider when making the decision not to.