this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
17 points (81.5% liked)
Quark's
2077 readers
47 users here now
Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!
General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Honestly a little shocked that his estate isn’t suing the absolute shit out of these psychos
Did you read the article at all? His estate and kids are all supportive of it, they want it made because of the important message of the movie (it’s based around some real life story). It sucks that they’re using AI but it’s what everyone seemed to want in this case. The man died from cancer, that’s the only reason he isn’t in the movie. He had already been cast but physically couldn’t handle being on set.
His estate wanted to make money fucking over another actor and creating a black hole of originality.
Val Kilmer wanted this as well. He had already had his voice recreated in AI for a previous movie so that he could continue to communicate with the audience in a way that felt more authentic to him (his "real" voice, not his voice while he was battling throat cancer).
Also, the director said that recasting would have been his preference but wouldn't be feasible for them as they don't have the budget to refilm the scenes with all the other actors.
Ya'll are bordering on disrespecting the wishes of a dead man.