Do you not think the person arrested for this is the killer?

Correct.

I think he was/is a patsy.

I think he did take a weapon, on that day, to the spot he was at... but he cannot have fired the shot that hit Kirk, from that location, with a 30.06.

Also... there is inconsistency about the entire timeline of where he was when, what he did with the weapon, and even what weapon we are even talking about.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Trp2oAltsj0

Did he... dissassemble it, and then reassemble it, and then go to the location, and then disassemble it, run and jump off the roof, and then reassemble it, and then hide it?

That doesn't make sense.

The FBI said that he wrapped up the gun in a towel or blanket, and hid it and planned to retrieve it later.

But ... the picture of the supposed recovered firearm ... is not wrapped in anything, its ... in a cardboard box.

The optic is mounted so poorly that it would probably be an overall detriment to making the shot it supposedly made.

So did he... hastily reassemble a weapon he intended to hide, poorly, for some reason?

And did he wrap it up, or put it in a box?

Theres also a ... lot of doubt that the correspondence between the shooter/patsy and his 'boyfriend', from the day itself is actually real, it uses highly unrealistic language.

You've got the weird older crazy guy who loudly announced he was the shooter, but... he wasn't.

But he also said the point of him doing that was to allow the actual shooter to escape.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20e1jx0p5jo

A 71-year-old man who was briefly detained moments after the assassination of Charlie Kirk tried to help the suspected gunman escape by faking a confession, authorities say.

Utah County Sheriff Michael Smith said George Zinn admitted to police that he had "yelled that he was the shooter to allow the actual suspect to flee".

...

Mr Zinn "intentionally yelled he was the shooter and by doing so, obstructed Law Enforcement from focusing on the actual shooter", the sheriff said in a statement.

Court documents filed by campus police allege that Mr Zinn began shouting: "I shot him - now shoot me."

...

Mr Zinn is well known among organisers of public events in Salt Lake City, the New York Times reported. "He showed up frequently to public forums with the intention to disrupt the event or question a high-profile speaker," it said.

He also has a long history of minor crimes, including an arrest in 2013 for sending a threatening email to the hosts of the Salt Lake City Marathon just days after the Boston Marathon bombing, the newspaper wrote.

I mean, I can't prove this, but if there ever was a plant, a paid agitator, a 'crisis actor'... this is what it would look like.

I think the kid genuinely did plan and intend to kill Kirk... and that other people knew about this, and essentially shadowed him.

Palantir? Discord?

Oh, yeah, turns out all that shit's monitored and catalogued in real time.

So, shadow the kid with a crew.

If the kid was gonna do it, great, he did it, mission accomplished.

If not, well, shooter 2 will pull the trigger if patsy wusses out, and then patsy takes the blame.

And I think scenario 2 is what happened there.

Who all, specifically, is involved in scenario 2?

Well, I don't know all the exact names, but Kash Patel is one of them, you know, Captain Coverup, some of the others would have to be close to Kirk.

All of this, this is all speculation.

As I said, I know what a gun can and can't do, the rest of this is a fucking mess.