this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
34 points (100.0% liked)
AskUSA
1216 readers
1 users here now
About
Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:
- !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here
Rules
- Be nice or gtfo
- Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
- Follow the rules of discuss.online
Sister communities
Related communities
- !asklemmy@lemmy.world
- !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
- !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
- !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
- !uspolitics@lemmy.world
- !politics@piefed.social
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.
(Although this is Delaware Supreme court, it's still the national precedent)
"Despite the expanse of precedent that Revlon has engendered in the more than 20 years since its issuance, the Revlon doctrine remains alive, well and surprisingly vague in terms of its scope and its application."
Basically it's about fudiciary responsibility, and has been used by shareholders to bludgeon board/CEOs to maximize profits over all other considerations... the engine behind enshitification