this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
43 points (74.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

40834 readers
948 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

Because there's an explicit bias in your questioning. You wouldn't question if I'm really cis-hetero, but you would question of I'm reeeeeeeeally gay or trans, even thought I'm sure there are more people who come up publicly as gay after having children than there are trans detransitioning.

This is the same as the maga mentality, where any man in a position of responsibility is accepted by default, but for women they demand justification for the role.

[–] definitely_AI@feddit.online 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

Isn't there an explicit bias in your statement? I think it's kind of relevant that the vast, vast majority of humans don't even consider this stuff, because they take no issue with accepting that they are men or women. Is that wrong? Are people wrong to think that it's ok to just be what you are? I genuinely don't get it.

By far, by every metric, people are divided into men and women. There are rare exclusions, and those people should be treated just as well as everybody else. It doesn't matter who they love or what they identify as. They are humans as every human, but it's bizarre to demand that the totality of humanity abandon their intuitive instincts about masculinity and femininity.

I mean by your own argument, surely normal "CIS" people (whatever that means, I genuinely don't know, I don't keep up with ideological abbreviations) also have a right to be heterosexual women and men. Are they not allowed to believe what people have believed for literally millions of years? I find that offensive. I extend you the courtesy to believe to be whoever you wish, and I acquiesce. Surely you should be able to do the same, otherwise you're just dictating your beliefs and demanding everybody accepts whatever it is that you say.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Well, that's a way to go from having a bias to just plain bigotry.

[–] definitely_AI@feddit.online 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

It's funny how it always devolves into name calling and domination tactics instead of actual argument. That only proves that this is not really about gender and equality, it's about using moral condemnation as a weapon to dominate others. It's very reminiscent of how fascists operate.

Do you have any kind of actual argument you would like to discuss?

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

It's funny how it always devolves into name calling

It's very reminiscent of how fascists operate.

Oh the irony.

I did tell you my stunts arguments, you started whining about your speech being blocked by "us" (whatever that means), then you proceeded to confirm you don't know basic language.

I would like to discuss, but honestly not with uninformed trolls. I see you have a pretty recent account, that+ your behavior leads me to believe you're just avoiding the ban you rightfully earned. I'll let you to rant a bit, will see you in your next account.

load more comments (3 replies)