yetAnotherUser

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

"BRB right back" doesn't look that bad tbh be honest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How would you determine that drinking tea doesn't cause the intersection between the queer and the straight set?

After all, S ∪ Q = Q => S ∩ Q = S

Also, I would argue that your preposition S ∪ Q = Q is false because Q ∖ S = Q. And since we know that S ≠ ∅, Q and S must be disjoint sets or else Q ∖ S ≠ Q.

Unless Q and S are sets which cannot be formulated in ZFC, the union of Q and S cannot be Q.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

e^iτ^ = 1 though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Mods, they broke the rule

Ban them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Fair enough, older cars absolutely have worse fuel economy. I wonder how much this is offset by US trucks growing in size and weight though - a modern gasoline truck may even have worse fuel economy despite 40 years of advances. Although that's not a high margin to clear to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Diesel has more NOx emissions and significantly more particulate emissions than cars running on gasoline, which is why cities are banning older vehicles running on Diesel. They're harmful to people's health, especially if they lack modern filters.

For CO2 though, Diesel usually runs miles around gasoline. That's why the EU has favored Diesel engines over gasoline one's since signing and ratifying the 1997 Kyoto protocol to reduce greenhouse emissions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just call it Ludolphian number smh

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It does increase the likelihood - marginally.

Fingerprint readers always got to balance between false positives and false negatives. If you want to reduce false negatives, false positives must be increased.

This shouldn't really matter though. False positives are very low as-is so increasing them a little has nearly no impact on security.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Just clench tight enough?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Confused? Take a look at global politics. The right-wing conservatives / fascists are winning everywhere.

There is not a chance in hell that a progressive candidate will win in the US in at least the next decade or two.

I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if California became a swing state (if the US remains a democracy) by 2032.

The swing in the presidential contest to Republicans in California was accompanied by a rejection of progressive ballot measures and a near-universal swing against progressive local candidates.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election_in_California

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You don't need a car in most of Europe.

Public transit exists in nearly every Eurpean country. It is certainly not great everywhere but it will run miles around anything Americans call public "transit".

Plus if you intend to migrate you will probably need to transfer your driver's license which may require a theoretical and/or practical exam.

view more: ‹ prev next ›