x0x7

joined 1 year ago
 
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm the ffmpeg guy. It's the pandoc of binary media, except it actually does do everything.

Hmmm. I need to write an PR for converting mardown to jpeg.

 

This is how an assumption that jobs are an inherent good has created a backwards understanding of economics that has made people in countries toil harder and have less.

Government making it a priorty or trying to beat down doors abroad and interfering with other countries policies is certainly not worth it.

Dollars don't have value. Goods do. Dollars only have value because they sometimes mean more goods. Jobs don't have value. The income does (sort of). A job is at least two degrees of seperation from the thing you actually want.

Actually goods don't have value. Contentedness does. But at least goods are closer to that in the chain. If you have a policy that trades something further down the chain for something more seperated because you made the mistake of ascribing value to it then you have a false economy. Jobs are a cost. We shouldn't want them in exchange for fewer goods. Trying to have fewer imports and more exports so you have more jobs is backwards.

I mean to say that the relationship between goods and contentedness is an imperfect relationship. But so is every layer. That's why having laser focus on something toward the end of the chain is so likely to create miscalculation. Each layer doesn't have a 1:1 relationship with the end thing you want. It's important to understand that chain and some of the common false economies in it. Blind chasing of one layer doesn't create good results.

 

It's based on a fairly common interview question but spiced up a bit.

It's based on this but I spiced it up a bit: https://medium.com/@shelvia1039/brain-teaser-2-tiger-and-sheep-9293acd97012

https://goatmatrix.net/c/MatrixFun/F71YGTSzZg

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Does that invalidate what he said? Isn't that just the genetic fallacy?

 
 

We're running this the same time as usual at 8pm Eastern at the usual place.

If anyone wants to tip the balance on what we watch it's not too late.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

True. But the US has a tendency to make exceptions for Israel. So the fact that he stuck to his math and didn't get Israel a special exception is a small win for US Israel relations. (aka making them more normal).

Basically it's exceptional that we didn't make an exception. That's kind of sad. But because it's exceptional it's worth noting.

 

That is perhaps that only silver lining in this. Is one very small indication that we are not entirely Israel's bitch.

I'll take one granual of sugar with my scalding cup of shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's called chutzpah. People who take that strategy in life should be ignored.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

My position is that no politician deserves respect.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

This is why we should end all federal policing. It's not in the constitution. You were never meant to interact with your federal government. The federal government was for regulating the states, interstate commerce, and common defense.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So instead you'd like protectionism for corporate moguls because at least it isn't free market?

Found the communist so dedicated to communism that in turn he hates the free market so much that he'd prefer government backed inequality. Anything that points out that its wrong should be questioned as suspect as wrong think. It's funny how useful the anti-wrong think crowd end up being to corporations.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What makes you think he supports Trump? What a strange comment.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Bring on the downvotes but the correct answer is don't. Free trade causes jobs in each country to align with recardiant advantage in those countries. We have the jobs we want now. Unless we are in the middle of a depression we don't want government to "provide more jobs". We don't need more jobs. We want better jobs. The whole reason why manufacturing has slowed down in the US is that the global market for manufacturing doesn't pay as well per man hour as other opportunities we already have.

Tariffs disrupt existing jobs to bring back old jobs. Old jobs we shouldn't want as much as the jobs we have now.

If you want to work a job that someone else is doing right now you should probably expect to make close to what they are making while doing it. Actually less because you are increasing supply. Do we want Americans to make Chinese wages? Now some manufacturing in the US doesn't pay Chinese wages because its work only we can do, hence why it is here, and pays American wages. But if you want to "take back manufacturing" then you are talking specifically about manufacturing they have already demonstrated they can do. So any of that manufacturing will pay at most a Chinese wage. Why the hell would you want those jobs?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How am I not aware of that being a thing. I looked it up to confirm my stupidity but I ended up finding what I thought I would find. Syrup to add to coffee. I have never heard of anyone selling a concentrated coffee syrup.

view more: next ›