wwwgem

As others said, the Arch wiki is so well made that it should be the only source you need. Videos will not bring you anything given your background. The main difference with other distros will be the package manager.

A video about the install process will just be someone reading the wiki to you, and a video to "explain" pacman to you will be overkill ;)

This recent post may be of interest to you: https://lemmy.ml/post/27474047

You may also find some ideas here or there.

I personaly use the power of neomutt and notmuch, but it's not a GUI option if that's what you're looking for.

I will not reiterate what others have well explained Re: the use of &, though it's surprising to see someone able to use dwm before getting control of the basics of the command-line :)

Coming back to your issue, have you applied the patch and recompiled dwm? Also, you may want to take a look at the note on this patch's github (which was last updated 13 years ago).

There are a lot of software alternatives depending on your needs and preferences. You may want to take a look here or there.

Linux is full of options to let you build the best system for you. That means you'll have to invest some time to decide what you want (starting with the distro). Moving to Linux is discovering a brand new world where it's easy to get discouraged and flooded by the freedom you're given.

In your efforts of developing a new desktop, I'd suggest to look around for already existing Linux desktops focused on visually impaired users. While they may go beyond what you're suggesting in your post (screen reader, text speech, braille output...) you may still get some inspiration from them.

Maybe you can find some inspiration here.

You may find what you need here or there.

Like @[email protected] I would personaly recommend the power of neomutt and notmuch, but it's not a GUI option if that's what you're looking for.

One of my favorite alternatives to the default commands.

Combined with this list, you should be covered :)

Note to OP: you don't want to use obsidian, but obsidian.nvim is not related and not dependent on the software with the same name. Obsidian.nvim offers a Zettelkasten approach too.
https://github.com/epwalsh/obsidian.nvim https://youtu.be/5ht8NYkU9wQ

No one's job is to screen PKGBUILD of AUR packages so it's technically not safe to use them. That being said the large community is keeping an eye on these packages and, while problems are not fully preventable, malicious stuff are caught pretty quickly.

So, to contrast with my first statement, one could argue that it's mostly safe to use AUR. That's even more true for packages used by a ton of people because issues/risks will be flagged almost immediately should they ever exist. That's the case for browsers, especially when developers themselves offer an AUR package (like Librewolf: https://librewolf.net/installation/arch/).

Packages from the AUR basically do what is written in the PKGBUILD and install script so that's why everyone will instruct you to learn about that before installing AUR packages with an helper. That's too much for some people though and at the end of the day you also have to trust the person who wrote the source code and which is compiled locally.

Nothing is 100% safe. I personally have 96 AUR packages installed because there's no other packages available (this includes stuff like my windows manager, python tools, 3D slicer, web browser...).

Same for me. It's frustrating to not see this one getting more popularity.