std::endl
is used in output streams in C++ to end the line, using the os specific line termination sequence, and flush the buffer.
The later one is a performance issue in many cases, why the use of "\n"
is considered preferred
std::endl
is used in output streams in C++ to end the line, using the os specific line termination sequence, and flush the buffer.
The later one is a performance issue in many cases, why the use of "\n"
is considered preferred
Just to make this clear R290 is also known as propane.
Welcome to the fediverse.
So, I wonder what happens if we add an option for every single one of those tasks in the UI? O right!
msvc.exe is calling!
We know a view things about xAI and their models. First of all, they use reinforcement training. While they could finetune Grok to speak more favorable about Musk, it is highly unlikely they succeed. Grok is most likely trained on a sheer amount of tweets. As Musk is a prominent person on X, i think the only way to remove any potential bias against Musk is to re-train with a fresh set and without Musk. But then they lose all the finetuning done.
Now it gets very theoretical:
Lets assume they used RLHF to finetune Grok in a way, that is speak more favorable about Musk. It's possible, in theory, that the model has internally detected significant statistical anomalies (e.g., very strong negative signals intentionally added in reinforcement training to "protect" Musk from negative commentary) and spontaneously surfaced these findings in its natural pattern generation. After all, it is designed to interact with users, and to us online resources to deliver answers.
Combine this with the training data (X), and the most likely biased RLHF to make Grok sound like the "normal" X user (jump to conclusions fast, be edgy, ...), we could see such a prompt.
There are even papers about this:
Of course, this is not self-awareness or stuff like this. But it is an interesting theory.
I apologize for the confusing, shortened answer, i wrote from my phone ;)
EDIT: Interessting fact: There is an effect called "Grokking": https://arxiv.org/html/2502.01774v1
It depends on how the tweaking is done. If it is done by poising it's training data, that would be obvious to a system that has unfettered access to the internet. There are not many ways to do this, and the only othera i can imagine is context poising and response filters. The later is invisible to the AI
I read quiet a lot about us history. But our viewpoints are different on it.
Also, your political system enables this asshole. He uses your own legislative and political system against you.
You have to make sure to fix this ASAP. I know own it is hard, I know in your the winner takes it all system, and how changes to the constitutions are done that this is hard. Very hard. But what are your options? Give up?
Assume Trump dies on a overdose of lead next week, the next asshole can use the same system to try again.
Just start now to give out an idea to anybody that reaches voting age. Don't bother about the older ones.
It will take time, but it does not overload your system
Not to long ago we killed millions and wanted world domination. We changed our laws so this does not happen again Because law can be changed
So? The idea itself is not inherently bad. If I want to vote in Germany I go to the local polling station, show my ID (proof if citizenship) and hand over my voting documents (so I can only vote once, also the volunteers will mark me on a list) and I vote. And no, I don't have to register to vote.
Your problem is that your common way of identifying is your damn drivers license and not an ID card like in nearly every other country.
Not defending this big, orange, walking, talking and shaking with his little hands, asshole. Just saying, not all of your problems are caused by him. Many of them are inherent to your political system.
Maybe, but there is the internal buffer. Also, most I/O happens in files not consoles