tsugu

Most people don't care about version numbers of CLI software/drivers. For GUI apps there's flatpak/snap or whatever is the official method a dev chose.

I can confirm the auto updates work. When I push a new version, all devices start using it within days.

That is pretty funny. However the "not having it at all" mfs suddenly reconsider when it's the only way to install an app. I for example maintain the 4K Video Downloader Plus snap and the only other installation method is a .deb. In the stats I can see many other distros than just Ubuntu. I think it's the ideal packaging format for apps that should stay up to date at all time, even if the system isn't.

I like Ubuntu and related technologies around it so when I wanted to learn Linux packaging I went for snap. It turned out to be not as hard as I thought, and from my experience they run just fine. And are capable of packaging more types of apps than flatpak.

idk what to tell you, I used it on an old Hp laptop from 2008 with an HDD. Ran just fine. Maybe try it again in 2025

No thanks, I like snaps

Both are official and work well so there isn't really a need for it. But some people just want to make their experience harder because snap bad.

it's a parody of the memes where it's typing commands for 20 minutes to install a web browser

You can use snap set system refresh.retain=Number to change the number of stored versions. It's unfortunate it filled up your storage but in case a dev pushes a faulty update, all you have to do is snap revert app

Hi, a real snap packager here. In comparison to flathub the devs are not required to publish their snapcraft.yamls but the store won't accept an app with privileged access. By default you can't even connect to dbus. You go to the forum, link your snapcraft.yaml and explain why you need the access. The process is the same with plugs that don't auto connect, which ones are those you can read here. You can upload an app with a plug that doesn't auto connect but your users will have to manually do so.

The requirements for classic snaps (no confinement) are much stricter and the admins are careful about granting that privilege. The store also makes it clear whether a package is official or from a star developer so if the app is going to handle sensitive data, you probably won't trust an unverified developer.

As for the walled garden, you're free to share your .snap files and their snapcraft.yamls anywhere you want. Canonical has control of the central store but nothing can stop you from having a repo with snaps that your users install locally. The vast majority of apps won't do that because there's no reason to, but you can. I know Obsidian Notes used to do that at some point.

Corporate owned

Let's shill Fedora and OpenSUSE instead, who depend on the money and support from their corpos. At least they don't directly own them amiright?

Old ass repos

Take a wild guess why snap was created. To have up to date packages across all Ubuntus.

Not even stable

https://youtu.be/JKZKpXaJsPI

"The tech behind Europe's space missions

Linux Mint better

Their main version is literally customized Ubuntu, LMDE is barely recommended or used

Does not ask before doing anything major

What?

More snaps

More fun