throwback3090

Not everything has to be this. Please stop.

He's rich and hires youth to rob them of their youth. None of them will ever unionize either, they think they are the lucky ones.

You can change the provider to bitwarden.

I mean you're right about banks but your examples make no sense.

Banks generally don't support 2fa, which is bad. Some banks (fidelity) still have character limits on passwords because they stores it in plaintext until recently so you could use it through the telephone system. They could implement a secure tap to pay system on your phones with enhanced security, rather than relying on Google to handle their job. And for credit cards themselves, switch to chip and pin.

"Banks don't have mobile apps"?? "Signatures are secure"?????🤡

Wow that's madness

Didn't know it happened other than lemmy

The funny thing about this whole conversation is I genuinely don't know which population it's supposed to be disparaging. (Also I'll note I never saw the message you responded to, given it was mod removed on Lemmy it could be super toxic or it could be "I don't like Linux that much", but I assume the former)

Don't get me wrong I know I could look it up, but it's easier to just not care and go with the flow when I'm around folks in their 20s...and also not care and go with the flow when I'm around folks in their 50s.

Oscar wild is pure sex and resting in power, so...maybe both

I know it from the Janelle monet song which apparently quotes a book from 2002 but I find it hard to believe that's the first time the phrase was said.

I just Ctrl+f'd the article and can confirm it's not defined. Why do you say it is?

Edit: woof there's something going on in the replies that I do not want to be part of.

You're in the wrong here. Reread the message and the tone of the message and then I'd like a 500 word essay on which particular diction in the post makes you think he's an edgelord rather than someone who genuinely doesn't know who would abbreviate something "r-word" as if it's an equivalent moral choice to call a person by that word as it is to call a person by a word that evokes 400 years of triangle trade suffering (or for a subset of the us population, the analogous c-word which many view as evoking 10,000 years of misogynistic behaviors).

Once that essay is done, I'd like 1000 words on why you think this post makes him anti-trans or, if it's easier, anti-"pronoun" whatever that happens to be a dog whistle for in your head. Feel free to use their comment history for this one if needs be.

I think this one is generational (for real, not "these kids don't have work ethic"). I don't know anyone in my age group that cares at all. I've only ever heard people a decade younger than me say "r-word" in real life.

Everything is sex, except sex, which is power