sukhmel

I mean the time when games from 90's were just games, because it was 90's

This is what should've been in the description, imo

The new methods developed by DeepSeek (and published in its latest paper) could help to overcome this issue. Instead of storing words as tokens, its system packs written information into image form, almost as if it’s taking a picture of pages from a book. This allows the model to retain nearly the same information while using far fewer tokens, the researchers found.

Besides using visual tokens instead of just text tokens, the model is built on a type of tiered compression that is not unlike how human memories fade: Older or less critical content is stored in a slightly more blurry form in order to save space. Despite that, the paper’s authors argue, this compressed content can still remain accessible in the background while maintaining a high level of system efficiency.

I agree about 95, but still it should be pre 2007, because it's when everyone started bitching about Vista being garbage instead 🤣

Slides will be made available after a meeting we have scheduled to discuss kicking pros, cons, and solutions

A lot of these are funny but sound like something a person who has never seen a goat would assume. For instance, you definitely not always have the right permissions to milk a goat, otherwise you will get kicked and not in an SSH session.

There's a line about getting something 98 to speed up something 95, so the original is maybe from before 2000 even, otherwise there would be some rant about NT and 2000 server.

What I meant to say is that they can easily use both a phone and a PC, and still think it's arcane and cryptic. Even if they needed to tinker with it, e.g. a lot of DOS games required me to set IRQ, and I still don't know precisely what it is

I'm afraid this required much more tinkering back in the day, and will be way less educational now. Maybe building and running a PC from 2005 or earlier will require the same level of getting to know things, but otherwise it will not teach to not treat computer as arcane and enigmatic, imo

I'm guessing inefficient in a sense that with distributed you need more computational power in total than with centralised

Probably not fans of Nintendo or something

That's how it should be, not how it is

I think what they meant is nobody in management cares if someone wants to hold them accountable

Bit it's a nice picture, yeah