sukhmel

joined 2 years ago
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I can try to summarise my view like this: I believe, that in practice most of critical system repair locks are scam because everyone just hopes that shit will hold long enough; I was writing about why it could be reasonable if it was actually done with proper care by licensed people, and why repairs done by an unlicensed technician could be dangerous

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Only if it's a special transport, i.e. an ambulance, a fire truck, or such

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My sound is on, but I hear nothing ¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

I think, legally forbidden fixing could make sense for things that people's life depends on, like health devices, or amusement park installations, or aviation. On the other hand, I don't know if that is applied reasonably in reality (likely not)

Edit: I mean, even in that case the repairs are allowed, but only for a qualified party

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I should've been more specific that I was talking about Muslims

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is that a US thing? I've never seen that use in Europe (yet?)

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, I mean, I can't make sense of what you wrote

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You mean, I wouldn't care about them if I saw them up close, too?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

I can see better if I sit higher

we have a solution for that, actually

a man on a vintage bicycle with a very high seat

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

The picture is horrible, but the idea (maybe) was like this?

  3 5
3 5
_____
3 8 5
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

I guessed it right, but was afraid for a bit. They changed the title to be more specific now, was a hurry not a clickbait

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

I'd disagree, but with some squinting of the eye (a lot of it maybe) it kinda maybe does. Might be an Easter egg, too

view more: ‹ prev next ›