Couldn't you have used a better and non-paywalled source?
stoly
Yeah. I seriously find it offensive when people post articles that nobody can read. WSJ and Economist are other such examples.
I’m into my second professional job and I feel like I’m working in highschool projects where no one actually does any work.
In my experience, most people never develop much past their high school years. They are just sort of stuck as the person they were when they turned 16 or 17. the fact that you are asking these questions means that you are capable of growth. I always recommend getting through college and getting a masters if you can just so that you can work around people who have developed further.
You're repeating yourself.
No, you were under the impression that you could sow doubt where none is due.
I haven't seen. What happened? Did he open his mouth in court?
lol I didn't go down that rabbit hole but I can see someone going there
These are probably the non-science edgy types, in retrospect.
Hilariously maybe 17 years ago I asked in the reddit ask science channel how dangerous space junk was to satellites and basically got “hurr durr space is big idiot” in reply.
Nicotine itself is safe in appropriate quantities. It’s the delivery mechanism that is really dangerous.
It’s very clear that you have no experience with statistics or science.
I am so pleased by the comments I am seeing here.