someguy3

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

30 below is expected.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

I like how Canada used their old leopard 1s for target practice when we know now they could have been outfitted as Gepards

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

They'll also never care.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read/skimmed the first 2 because they really went on. They seem to be reaching hard. A whole lot of flowery language to evoke an emotional response of unease. If they had anything real they would have gotten to the point. The only thing that was concrete (that I saw) was he said a study was on humans when it was on rats. Testing on rats is common and he could have misremembered.

*I did a ctrl+f on "Sarah" (his partner) and it comes up 56 times. Sure whatever form of cheating is bad, but this is the exact emotional stuff they went for. That's the kind of article it is. Fifty six times.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is he a snake?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 102 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tell him the best employees will quit. The rest will be too burnt out to actually do anything truly productive.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Community context: Fake, Androids don't die.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What does "&udm=14” do?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jesus wouldn't accept it from the entire conversation we had, someone else even chiming in. Next time look it up yourself if you don't believe anything instead of shoving refusal in everyone's face until someone finally had enough. Why do I bother.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

ACKSUALLY you didn't. The news writers saw it and told you, I saw it and told you, other people saw it and told you, everyone saw it and told you. You would not accept it. You jumped through every hoop you could and blamed everyone else to not accept it. Ciao.

 

I use an old mixed nuts container.

 

(I have no idea if accurate.)

 

And can they easily be replaced?

I'm not looking, just pondering and wondering about Framework.

 

48% of Americans are magnesium deficient. From googling, the hard to absorb inorganic ones are magnesium oxide and magnesium chloride. The easy to absorb organic salts include magnesium citrate, lactate, aspartate, and glycinate.

I also found when I eat eggs, I crave chocolate less. I think it's the fat content.

(But I expect many just like the sugar.)

 

"The times of peace are over, the post-war era is over. We live in new times - in the pre-war era; for some of our brothers, this is no longer even the pre-war era, but the period of full-scale war in its most cruel version," Tusk said.

 

Like there is so much salt in processed food I never felt the need to actually use the salt shaker (until I cut out processed food).

What does this mean for iodine intake? [FYI iodine was added to salt a long time ago because they found people were low in iodine. At the time people used salt shakers. Are we low now because, I'm figuring, people don't use salt shakers as much? Some googling says processed food doesn't use iodized salt.]

-1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/lotrmemes@midwest.social
 

Posted this a few days ago but this community is a better place.

Part 2 https://youtu.be/Fko4z7lADw0

Part 3 https://youtu.be/jgETccDDp8E

view more: ‹ prev next ›