shadowintheday2

joined 1 year ago
 

title

before 6.3, powerdevil randomly did not answer to increase/decrease brightness after comming back fromm a screen off, and I got it fixed by running systemctl --user restart plasma-powerdevil.service

however now I get a somewhat different problem, the screen is always back at 100% brightness after a dimming and then screen off, although powerdevil is still responsive to increase/decrease brightness shortcut

it's not a laptop, and therefore there is only one power setting running on - AC - via DP

Has anyone else experienced this ?

 

Meta + T will show some pre-defined tiling settings and paddings, and using Shift + mouse drag it's possible to quick tile windows in these patterns

is it possible to replicate this somehow via keyboard ?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

so it seems that without any config, the traffic passes from wlan1 to wlan0's network flawlessly; but traffic from wlan0 network stops at the Android device, even with iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT, so I'm clueless on what to do next

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

how could I set up NAT like this ? thanks

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

ip r

default via 192.168.15.1 dev enp3s0 proto dhcp src 192.168.15.32 metric 100
192.168.15.0/24 dev enp3s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.15.32 metric 100
192.168.38.0/24 via 192.168.15.21 dev enp3s0    
 

Ok I know this sounds crazy but it's all about Linux and iptables all the way

I'm using a rooted android phone as a VPN router to keep confidential traffic separated between networks

A and B are in the same network, B provides a separate network for C

Device A: Linux ip 192.168.15.32 wlan0 Device B: rooted Android phone with Termux and VPN Hotspot wlan0 ip 192.168.15.21 wlan1 ip 192.168.38.173

Device C: Windows 10 with RDP wlan1 ip 192.168.15.176

I've tried the following

A: sudo ip route add 192.168.38.0/24 via 192.168.15.21 dev enp1s0

B: Termux, su: sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1


iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.38.0/24 -o wlan0 -j MASQUERADE
iptables -A FORWARD -i wlan0 -o wlan1 -s 192.168.15.0/24 -d 192.168.38.0/24 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -i wlan1 -o wlan0 -s 192.168.38.0/24 -d 192.168.15.0/24 -j ACCEPT

C: default route via 192.168.38.173 metric 1

C is solely seeing the internet from B's VPN, and can even access wlan0's router, meaning it has access to its internal network. C can ping B, B can ping C

B can ping A and C

A can ping B, but not C, which also means no RDP access

What am I missing ?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

autistic fixation with IPV6

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

tyvm

seems to be working, even with some 404s returned

/var/lib/pacman/sync/multilib.db.part 100%[===================================================================================================================>] 137.53K --.-KB/s in 0.007s

2024-08-14 11:06:10 (19.4 MB/s) - ‘/var/lib/pacman/sync/multilib.db.part’ saved [140827/140827]

--2024-08-14 11:06:10-- https://mirror.osbeck.com/archlinux/multilib/os/x86_64/multilib.db.sig Loaded CA certificate '/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt' Resolving mirror.osbeck.com (mirror.osbeck.com)... 2606:4700:20::6819:5e05, 2606:4700:20::ac43:6136, 2606:4700:20::6819:5f05 Connecting to mirror.osbeck.com (mirror.osbeck.com)|2606:4700:20::6819:5e05|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 not found 2024-08-14 11:06:10 ERROR 404: not found.

 

I'm using IPV6-able mirrors

is it possible to force pacman to use IPV6 only, other than disabling IPV4 in the whole system?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That'd be over 1TB with zram on

 
 

is there a way to encrypt obsidian vaults using either symmetric/asymmetric encryption with multiple devices?

 

I want to configure a local webcam to stream (and possibly record) a live feed open to the internet, and acess it half-world away while traveling, using FOSS only acessing it via Android VLC

This guide was quite comprehensive; however the packages for nginx-rtmp are quite abandoned in arch linux. So I thought maybe WebRTC could be an alternative - the communication itself should be encrypted, which WebRTC seems to do; however, I still can't figure out if VLC will handle this well

Also, it seems that I might need to self-host a VPN to achieve this? What are my options? Has anyone else done this ?