riskable

joined 2 years ago
[–] riskable@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

He'll use his laptop running multiple girlfriend emulators to gamify the relationship!

[–] riskable@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

I Snickers at this comment.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just keep these fellas out of it:

Blue footed booby bird

[–] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Co-fecal humanism

[–] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

It was a real dick move.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well, good/useful AI integration. An AI that makes games infinitely replayable by changing the story, levels, and characters so they're 100% unique every time? That could be awesome. Oh man I bet that sort of thing would be amazing if done right in a roguelike game!

AI that tries to figure out how to sell you more loot boxes? No thanks!

[–] riskable@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

No, it's not wages that would increase prices huge amounts. They'd increase the price of goods slightly (depending on the good) but for the most part the biggest cost factor that increases when you decide to make something in the US is regulations.

Ya know, rules that prevent companies from dumping their toxic waste wherever TF they want. It's not just the regulations that apply to a specific company's business but all the regulations in their supply chain.

Consider a PCB manufacturer: They need epoxies, fiberglass, copper, gold, tin, and silver to make PCBs along with a shitton of associated chemicals. All of those things ultimately come from heavily regulated industries (because we don't want smelter waste full of things like lead, mercury, cobalt, and worse things winding up in our food and water). All that regulation costs money to deal with. Not just in actually complying with the regulations but also hiring people knowledgeable enough to make sure they're complying (and doing so in the least expensive way possible).

In countries like China regulations are basically non-existent because even if they have them officials can easily and cheaply be bribed to get around them (e.g. poisoned baby formula). Furthermore, the people are vastly more ignorant of health and pollution than your average idiot in the US. If some dude sees a company dumping tires on the side of the road they're likely to call the cops because that's obviously illegal. I'm China that doesn't happen because the people will be unlikely to understand the (environmental/downstream) consequences of that or will suspect the cops (and local officials) are in on it and reporting the illegal dumping could get them disappeared.

The most toxic industries are all overseas and we really do rely on them to keep supply chains going. Bringing them back onshore would drastically increase the cost of a shitton of goods just because there's no cheap way to dispose of byproducts here and there's way more requirements around handling such things.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

To be fair, an iPhone could be manufactured entirely in the US it would just cost 4x as much. Maybe 10x, actually.

CPU manufacturing would be the hardest to bring online. The second most difficult one would be screens (though we may not have tariffs with South Korea 🤷).

In the US there's already plenty of PCB manufacturing, CNC machining (case), ultra hard glass (screen) manufacturing, and it's relatively easy to ramp up capacitor and resistor manufacturing. Things like USB C connectors would need some company to step up though.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

That's old school. You gotta get into the modern equivalents: Airplane tracking and semi-autonomous robotics.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

When Dad doesn't joke about it.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago

The way this article reports about these things makes it seem like we should all be disappointed in the British. I mean, we should definitely all be disappointed in the British for sure but not because of their lack of adoption of X and AI! 🤣

view more: ‹ prev next ›