I would like to use it (or any biometric authentication at all) on Linux with my USB fingerprint reader (DigitalPersona 4500), but it seems broken in libfprint and the devs are unresponsive to their gitlab issues. Using a Windows VM just for fingerprint support is not something I want to do either.
refalo
joined 2 years ago
Security is a spectrum and not everyone has the same threat model. Also weaknesses that target passkeys might be useless for those who use passwords, and vice versa. And as another commenter said, you kinda lose the "something you know" when you're only using a passkey. Or you could use both if a service allows it.
Yep. Though not sure about Russia but I know China can and does block the majority of usual Tor access methods including the obfuscating pluggable transports like obfs4/snowflake/etc.
There are already many signal proxies available, plus an unlimited number of VPNs to choose from (or self-host yourself on a VPS)
My biggest problem with it (besides the people) is the fact that it still relies on Google's proprietary black box "Titan" security chip. You know, the one that they pinky-promised to open source but never did.
need boot capabilities in order to "exploit" this
only with broken Secure Boot implementations
already patched in EPYC microcode
a nothingburger released suspiciously a day after Intel breaks news of being sued by their own shareholders (https://www.techpowerup.com/325414/intel-faces-shareholder-lawsuit-amid-financial-turmoil-and-layoffs-company-misled-investors)
if you're going for ultimate privacy... none, ironically.
Jimmy Donaldson? (MrBeast)
always drank diet/zero sugar for decades. then one day I stopped being able to. any time I drink it now I get massive headaches.
I think the "rest of your tabs" would have to be sites that already include google js (e.g. for "sign in with google" type stuff) to even know you have a google cookie (otherwise what's the point of FPI/ETP/TCP/network partitioning/no-3rd-party-cookies/etc.), but I could be wrong.