recentSlinky

joined 3 months ago
[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Water is as wet as clothes are clothed.

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

It's telling enough when you see fox segments that were supposedly made to demonize him and it's things like "free child care for all, fare taxes for all, fare wages based on labor".

I think they're so up their asses that they completely forgot how regular people even think. Many of their attacks were basically advertising for his campaign lol.

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Baloney, with garlic and mustard 😋

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 83 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Based woke brown man

You talking about jesus??

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

He said when you're "mad". It's fine if it's because of hate and assholery.

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Can someone educate me a bit about the US's political laws. Is it legal to campaign for votes by threatening the voters? 🤔

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 87 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Didn't they get sued (by trump) and settle over doing this with the Harris interview? Can't the precedent be used against them for doing it again to win another lawsuit against them very easily? Or couldn't they use that precedent against trump to force the full interview as well?

I don't know much about US law but this seems very legally sketchy to me. I guess kissing ass takes over the law in these cases.

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago

And when one of the main ingredients is woke (science) will also mean they won't be able to any time soon

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 38 points 3 weeks ago

Because everyone knows the bigger the bubble, the better the economy. Right?... Right!?!

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Capping wealth. 100% taxation over a certain amount. If you can't make more money, why steal wages from your employees or raise prices more than it's needed? And if you do, all extra money will be taxed and gets back to the people anyways.

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

I didn't understand most of these legal sounding words. I have no idea what the conclusion of this is. So they allowed him to break the law, or stopped him again from breaking it? Can someone translate this to normal english please

[–] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

The same company that said they'll replace most workers with robots within 5-10 years? Lol yeah that's not happening with this level of technological progrsss.

It'll be as probable if they said they'll replace the humans with summened servants from the underworld. A fairytale :)

view more: ‹ prev next ›