quill7513

joined 2 days ago
[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

toootally get that. the 5 brands i listed in that long post are the only ones i feel comfortable recommending for a reason

[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

i don't have anything specific on them. i've bought plenty of altra's so clearly i'm not above buying wolverine

[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 2 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

all of the major athletic shoe brands are up to shady shit because they profit from slave labor in the global south.

  • nike donates to conservatives in the US
  • adidas (who owns reebok) and asics furnish discounts to the IDF
  • puma stays out of politics directly, but should still be side eyed for how fairly their laborers are compensated. of the majors they probably win the "most least evil" award
  • under armour's founders have been very active promoters of CPAC
  • new balance has a recent legacy of their ceo backing conservatives in the US but has since replaced him. side eye them
  • brooks outright provides shoes to the IDF

the only shoe companies that i feel genuinely comfortably recommending:

  • luna sandals
  • enda running shoes
  • veja
  • wildling
  • xero if you're into court sports like pickleball or basketball
[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 5 points 21 hours ago

they were both ranking nazi party members

[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus -3 points 21 hours ago (8 children)

Adidas was founded in the 1920s in Germany and remained in operation throughout the 1930s and 40s if that helps clue you in

[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 3 points 22 hours ago

the best thing you can do to resist it i think is make sure the people in your life know you value them for them and not for their aesthetic charm. everyone tell a friend right now that you think they're funny, or that you apprecieate their kindness, or that you value their perspective, or anything that's based on their persona and not their physical appearance. and if you are struck by someone's physical charm, pause, and take a moment to notice their outfit and compliment that instead. their outfit required them to make choices about their personal sense of style

[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 20 points 22 hours ago

until further notice i'm assuming norwegian kroner

[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

this reminds me of a story. a friend who who underwent HRT and surgical transition early in life with support of her parents. she started dating someone in her mid 20s. he was kind, patient, and gentle to her for the first months of their relationship. then the topic of kids came up. she was upfront with him. "we'd have to adopt. i'm trans" and it was like a lightswitch turned in him. he screamed at her for tricking him and stormed out sticking her with the restaraunt bill. by all of the things that supposedly matter in society, she had done everything right. she was conventionally attractive by femme standards, her physical appearance was so in alignment with femme standards in fact that this secret chud hadn't even realized she was trans. but still, the moment she couldn't perform the full societal standard for what it means to be femme presenting, she was met with threats of physical violence, abandoned, and left to fulfill a responsibility that it had been pre-agreed on he would cover.

and i ask you: who tricked who? the trans woman who in 2013 didn't want to bring up her transness until she knew she was safe, or the man who said he was an ally up until the moment someone he said he loved turned out to require even basic allyship

[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 7 points 1 day ago

REGROW YOUR HAIR. WORK YOUR MUSCLES LIKE YOU DID WHEN YOU WERE 17 EVEN THOUGH YOU'RE 40. EAT STEAK. YOUR VALUE AS A MASCULINE MALE IS TO PERFORM AGGRESSION, NOT IN YOUR ABILITY TO GROW OUT OF THAT BEHAVIOR

[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 33 points 1 day ago (9 children)

and if you interrogate where that insecurity has its roots, you will often find the answer is a society that constantly subjects women to judgement for their appearance, be that negative or positive judgement. it is simply the experience of being judged. botox, ozempic, plastic surgery, etc all becomes gender affirming care when you are femme in a society that requires femme identifying people to perform the role of disireable sexual object

the original post asks why. the original post also is why

and men have their own experiences with oppositional gaze, too, so we are clear. if you've ever heard the phrase "low t" applied to a man in his 30s or later, you have witnessed it

[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 day ago

global climate change is a phenomenon in which the entire planet is warming. this causes spikes in extreme weather. it still being cold in one place does not prove or disprove anything about trends of the entire global system

[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 3 points 2 days ago

i have learned something about the birds on the other coast from me by merit of a stupid joke naming a bird. the internet is amazing if you can avoid the slapfights

view more: next ›