projectmoon

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Well if she is acquitted on appeal for example. But no idea how the sentencing works in cases like this. Maybe someone with knowledge of French law can chime in.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

1 scenario tested is better than 0 tested.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This guy would fit in well at my previous job where the founder discouraged writing unit tests because "there are too many scenarios to test."

Like, wtf...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

That was entirely the point unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/56114125

I wanna fly away, on a unicorn, to discover a land of freedom and light...

This image was made using ComfyUI with Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium. I can't tell you the exact prompt, because I asked OLMo2 via Open WebUI to make me a picture of a rainbow unicorn galloping through outer space.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lol, there are smaller versions of Deepseek-r1. These aren't the "real" Deepseek model, but they are distilled from other foundation models (Qwen2.5 and Llama3 in this case).

For the 671b parameter file, the medium-quality version weighs in at 404 GB. That means you need 404 GB of RAM/VRAM just to load the thing. Then you need preferably ALL of that in VRAM (i.e. GPU memory) to get it to generate anything fast.

For comparison, I have 16 GB of VRAM and 64 GB of RAM on my desktop. If I run the 70b parameter version of Llama3 at Q4 quant (medium quality-ish), it's a 40 GB file. It'll run, but mostly on the CPU. It generates ~0.85 tokens per second. So a good response will take 10-30 minutes. Which is fine if you have time to wait, but not if you want an immediate response. If I had two beefy GPUs with 24 GB VRAM each, that'd be 48 total GB and I could run the whole model in VRAM and it'd be very fast.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They're probably referring to the 671b parameter version of deepseek. You can indeed self host it. But unless you've got a server rack full of data center class GPUs, you'll probably set your house on fire before it generates a single token.

If you want a fully open source model, I recommend Qwen 2.5 or maybe deepseek v2. There's also OLmo2, but I haven't really tested it.

Mistral small 24b also just came out and is Apache licensed. That is something I'm testing now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Most open/local models require a fraction of the resources of chatgpt. But they are usually not AS good in a general sense. But they often are good enough, and can sometimes surpass ChatGPT in specific domains.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

It's enough to run quantized versions of the distilled r1 model based on Qwen and Llama 3. Don't know how fast it'll run though.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Don't know about "always." In recent years, like the past 10 years, definitely. But I remember a time when Nvidia was the only reasonable recommendation for a graphics card on Linux, because Radeon was so bad. This was before Wayland, and probably even before AMD bought ATI. And it was certainly long before the amdgpu drivers existed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Please bring back the overflow menu!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Where is this? Somewhere in Europe?

15
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I've been working on keeping the OSM tool up to date for OpenWebUI's rapid development pace. And now I've added better-looking citations, with fancy styling. Just a small announcement post!

Update: when this was originally posted, the tool was on 1.3. Now it's updated to 2.1.0, with a navigation feature (beta) and more fixes for robustness.

 

Over the weekend (this past Saturday specifically), GPT-4o seems to have gone from capable and rather free for generating creative writing to not being able to generate basically anything due to alleged content policy violations. It'll just say "can't assist with that" or "can't continue." But 80% of the time, if you regenerate the response, it'll happily continue on its way.

It's like someone updated some policy configuration over the weekend and accidentally put an extra 0 in a field for censorship.

GPT-4 and GPT 3.5 seem unaffected by this, which makes it even weirder. Switching to GPT 4 will have none of the issues that 4o is having.

I noticed this happening literally in the middle of generating text.

See also: https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1droujl/ladies_gentlemen_this_is_how_annoying_kiddie/

https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1dr3axv/anyone_elses_ai_refusing_to_do_literally_anything/

 

Current situation: I've got a desktop with 16 GB of DDR4 RAM, a 1st gen Ryzen CPU from 2017, and an AMD RX 6800 XT GPU with 16 GB VRAM. I can 7 - 13b models extremely quickly using ollama with ROCm (19+ tokens/sec). I can run Beyonder 4x7b Q6 at around 3 tokens/second.

I want to get to a point where I can run Mixtral 8x7b at Q4 quant at an acceptable token speed (5+/sec). I can run Mixtral Q3 quant at about 2 to 3 tokens per second. Q4 takes an hour to load, and assuming I don't run out of memory, it also runs at about 2 tokens per second.

What's the easiest/cheapest way to get my system to be able to run the higher quants of Mixtral effectively? I know that I need more RAM Another 16 GB should help. Should I upgrade the CPU?

As an aside, I also have an older Nvidia GTX 970 lying around that I might be able to stick in the machine. Not sure if ollama can split across different brand GPUs yet, but I know this capability is in llama.cpp now.

Thanks for any pointers!

view more: next ›