p3n

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

The difference is sincerity.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

My point is that memes like this use religion as a strawman because they don't actually want to discuss the foundational concepts expressed by the meme. Which is what I addressed, in my admittedly very lenghy, response.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The TLDR is that science requires a much faith as religion, and that people aren't willing to take ten minutes to read more than a couple paragraphs and contemplate the fundamental nature of reality, because you know, it's not as important as a meme...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

While trust and faith aren't perfect synonyms they are closely related: https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/trust

As for math, are you familiar with Gödel's incompleteness theorems?

This is a good explanation/interview for anyone who is not: https://youtu.be/u3GYrEOoKGk

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I respectfully disagree with that consensus.

Her legal name was Bradley Manning when she was charged and tried: https://web.archive.org/web/20110726100828/http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/eCache/DEF/12/444.html

When referring to legal proceedings it only makes sense to use someone's legal name during those proceedings. Court documents do not get retroactively updated when someone changes their name.

Ultimately, what is disrespectful to Chelsea Manning is entirely determined by Chelsea Manning not the Lemmy Community, Military Community, Trans Community, or any other group.

Nobody gets to be offended for me, and I am the sole determiner of what is respectful and disrespectful to me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Lol the folks at archive.org are the real heros.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Good interview with the Dev for anyone who is interested in more of the details from this thread, like why Swift? What's so hard about browsers? Etc. https://youtu.be/z1Eq0xlVs3g

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Reminds me of the Alan MacMasters hoax, famous inventor of the toaster: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_MacMasters_hoax

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Religion aside, if the universe is fundamentally unpredictable, then science is impossible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Yep, definitely inciting violence.

47
Probably not now... (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

They might be ok...

Full size source: https://i.imgur.com/gYL8svb.mp4

-50
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I think this gives a little more nuanced perspective than simply "pro-choice" or "pro-life". This is my tier list. What is yours? If it's different, why? If it's the same, why?

Edit: Fixed tier format

 

This comic is inspired by XKCD and recent events and observations in my life. Disclaimer: I have no artistic ability and blatantly rip off the XKCD style and artwork, however the idea is mine and I feel it fits.

view more: next ›