null

joined 4 months ago
[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 6 points 4 months ago (57 children)

And how can you know that intent without being a mindreader?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

at that point you might as well use regular hashes to verify the integrity of your video

Generated by what authority, though?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 4 points 4 months ago (59 children)

I get how condescending to someone because they are a woman is bigoted

Right, but you've also claimed it's impossible to believe that's happening without being a bigot.

Your logic concludes that any women who thinks a man is being misogynistically condescending to them is a bigot.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (145 children)

But you can't callout a man for being misogynistically condescending to a woman. Got it.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 5 points 4 months ago (343 children)

Them:

Definition of "Mansplaining"

You:

Isn’t that misandry to assume the man is a sexist

That explanation requires prior knowledge or post hoc knowledge

They didn't make any assumptions, nor did they explain anything that "requires prior knowledge" -- because they gave a definition of a term, not a scenario. Your questioning only makes sense if they were talking about a scenario. It makes no sense as a follow up to a definition.

Anyways, that's just meta noise.

Correct, both are based on assumptions that are as offensive as the assumption that they’re mansplaining or a dei hire or whatever.

My point is that you can’t use either without yourself being bigoted enough to come to a conclusion based on bigoted assumptions so how are they substantially different?

You're free to call women bigoted for how they feel about their lived experience regarding condescension from men. Just as I'm free to judge that as incel behaviour.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 6 points 4 months ago (345 children)

Yeah and I'm asking them to use their definition in comparison

To be clear, no you weren't. Hence the confusion.

But since you've clarified: obviously using any term to unfairly accuse someone of being or doing something is a bad thing. Is that a real question?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 9 points 4 months ago (347 children)

It wasn't an explanation about how to assess whether someone is mansplaining or not -- it was a definition of what mansplaining is.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 5 points 4 months ago

I'm at about half a year, and I thought for sure I'd be mixing in Google from time to time, but nope.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm running out of content (buying more soon) but I wanted to use my remaining content to let you know that

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 3 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Hi random post, does my comment federate?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Hi random post -- does my federation work?

view more: ‹ prev next ›