null

joined 4 months ago
[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 19 points 2 months ago

I am very glad that someone, anyone, is calling out this administration on it's criminal acts.

A random on social media? There's plenty of those calling that out.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And instead he did it with AI in 1/3rd of that time. What's your point?

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

A Stan is someone who is a fan of something.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 3 points 2 months ago (11 children)
[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My benevolent brother in Christ above

How can you tell someone to talk like an adult and then bring this childish meme out in the same comment...

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For instance any amount of THC in the blood can get an impaired driving charge. Unless it is a legalized state in which case it minuscule tiny amount that could have resulted from smoking 14 week days ago is still enough.

Sure, that's just the law.

With the smallest amounts, one nanogram per milliliter, false positives are as high as 40%, but when they go into court they don't say that.

I don't think the lab techs attend the court cases to provide details about how testing works...

If you know that, you don't think a decent defense lawyer knows that?

What I asked for was a source for your bold claim that:

drug testing Labs try to give the results the cops want.

Interesting that you'd downvote me just for asking for a source for your strong claim though...

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 0 points 2 months ago (20 children)

Plus the drug testing Labs try to give the results the cops want.

Source? That's a strong claim...

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 1 points 2 months ago

MusicBrainz Picard is your friend.

[–] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 20 points 2 months ago

Not useless -- you have a future in tiny, embedded systems.

view more: ‹ prev next ›