what a gish gallop. you sure you didn't have any more righteous claims too stack in?
nsrxn
joined 1 month ago
write on mobile and go for speed over accuracy
no one believes you
no. get gud.
I thought you said spam by definition was repeated.
if your position is that professional ethicists are wrong, and we shouldn't entertain their stance, I don't see how you're any different from a quack or theologian.
who said anything about a law enforcement agency
it's highly relevant to your erroneous claim
"no one should entertain people who value virtue over consequence."
the experts in the field just disagree with this stance.
there is a survey of philosophers that shows what I said is true
yet another unsupported claim.
saying something doesn't make it true
view more: next ›
where are the fucking mods