nimisnimi

..to be the only sentence.

/Ftfy

100% of online respondents have confirmed they have access to internet.

Spanish inquisition!

They do, yeah! And they have several models, not only single speed bikes, but geared too (pinion and enviolo).

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

That is very Trump of you, shouting "fake news!" whenever been caught red-handed and shutting/blocking.

Ok, bye.

That's not in the cable

Well, Sherlock, good catch! That's an affing wireless charging system. /S

The 90 % efficiency claimed in the OP - is the claimed TOTAL efficiency of the PRODUCT by Porsche (wireless charging station). Of course "it's not in the cable" (rofl), it's in ALL the electric components of the system - which is OVERALL less efficient than a similar (as in function and provided power) charging station.

Similar, but noticably POORER in efficiency (~ it has 10% more losses than a similar wired charging solution). As even the Porsche marketing claims.

If you still fail to get it - then you might want to follow your own unsolicited advice:

Have a web search.

I can rewrite the whole press release by Porsche for you, but i can not understand it for you.

If you fail to understand what's been discussed and compared to (i.e., wireless vs wired charging)

and yet keep your arrogant stance towards others (~~in the now deleted comment literally you~~_were yelling at someone to ~~shut their mouth~~ look this stuff up before starting to write about it

or another arrogant "have a web search" thrown randomly at me),

then why would you act surprised at insults as a response to your regular toxic behaviour?!

Mate, focus (and would you please avoid shoving advice and links when not openly asked?!): 90 percent efficiency claim is directly in the OP.

The number can even be confirmed at the press release by Porsche (which boldly claims charging efficiency to be "over 90 percent").

Focus and keep the number in your mind (the number found BOTH in the OP and confirmed at the Porsce's press release) while trying to explain where the losses do take place.

I totally understand, that losses do happen when the electricity is converted first to DC and then back to high freq.AC and during the inductive charging itself.

This is expected and is a convenience tax of sorts (getting rid of cables and plugs) and yet, it's less efficient than plugging directly. Once again, only 90℅ efficient.

I don't have the crayons to explain it to you any simpler 8)

The article mentions "about 90%" of efficiency (i understand it as additional losses when compared to wired charging).

I'd say that's quite bad, and can not be easily disregarded.